3. Profile of the Department of Justice component of the PSAT Initiative
The Department's role in the PSAT Initiative is to provide legislative support and policy development, legal advice and assistance, prosecution and civil litigation. The additional funding provided to the Department under PSAT is intended primarily to address an increased demand for its services resulting from the sudden and intense demands placed on the Department in the period immediately following the September 2001 terrorist attacks, as well as the anticipated increase in the level of activity in the areas of anti-terrorism and public safety.
This section describes the Department's PSAT component logic, including its activities and expected impacts. Figure 1 (page 8) presents a diagram of activities, outputs and outcomes.[5]
Six core activities under the PSAT Initiative reflect the legal advisor role the Department plays in the Initiative. These activities are presented in Table 3.
| Activity | Description |
|---|---|
| Policy development and analysis | Assisting with drafting policy and legislation, research, and legal advice to the Minister of Justice and other government departments on new or existing legislation, policies, and initiatives related to terrorism or public safety |
| Legal advice and assistance | Advising on anti-terrorism and public safety policies as well as operational issues, such as the disclosure of sensitive documents and the use of investigative techniques |
| International advice and assistance | Providing legal advice and technical assistance in negotiating international instruments, and implementing international obligations through domestic legislation, assisting other countries with the development of anti-terrorism legislation, as well as generally supporting the work of Canada with its international partners on issues related to anti-terrorism and public safety |
| Outreach, training and education | Providing training and educational sessions on the ATA forgovernment departments and the general public |
| Civil litigation and prosecution | Handling civil challenges to the ATA and PSA, as well as requests for disclosure of sensitive documents, and managing or supporting prosecutions for terrorism-related offences |
| Provision of contribution funding to the provinces and territories or their legal aid delivery entities | Ensuring that the economically disadvantaged accused affected by public safety and anti-terrorism initiatives have access to legal aid |
| Source: Based on descriptions in the Department of Justice (2006). Results-based Management and Accountability Framework for the Public Safety and Anti-Terrorism Initiative. | |
The activities listed in section 3.1.1 are expected to contribute to the achievement of the following initial outcomes:
The successful achievement of the initial outcomes will also support the following intermediate outcomes:
Finally, the activities are expected to lead to the ultimate outcome of enhanced public safety and security while respecting human rights.
Figure 1, Logic Model for Public Safety and Anti-Terrorism Initiative
Public safety and anti-terrorism issues cut across subject areas and legal specialties, requiring collaboration and consultation among relevant Department of Justice organizational units, other federal departments, provincial governments, and international counterparts. For this reason, the structure of relationships within the PSAT Initiative is complex.
The following are the main groups within the Department of Justice that have a role in its PSAT component:
Table 4 (next page) shows in greater detail the main sections in the Department that are involved in the PSAT Initiative, and provides descriptions of their involvement. Please note that Table 4 does not include sections that provide organizational, administrative, and evaluation support, such as the Executive Services Office, Corporate Services, or the Evaluation Division.
Table 4 is based on the structure of the Department prior to December 12, 2006, the effective date of the PPSC. The FPS regional offices and the Ottawa-Gatineau office discussed in Table 4 are now part of the PPSC, except for counsel who perform extradition and mutual legal assistance work. The NSG and IAG remain part of the Department of Justice.
The federal government allocated 1% ($78 million) of its $7.7 billion PSAT budget to the Department of Justice. Most of these funds are dedicated to the provision of PSAT-related legal services, including legal support, advice and assistance at the national and international levels, as well as conducting prosecutions and civil litigation related to anti-terrorism and public safety legislation and policies. In addition, $2.5 million per year is used to provide legal aid funds to provinces and territories to cover costs of PSAT-related criminal legal aid services, such as immigration and refugee legal aid or representation for those charged under the ATA.
Usually when the TB approves additional resources for a department, these new funds are combined with the existing resources, and the department can reallocate the funds, subject to standard policies and regulations governing departmental spending. For national security programs like the PSAT Initiative, TB requires funded departments to establish special purpose allotments, whereby all money received has to be disbursed exclusively on the basis of the TB submissions and cannot be reallocated internally for other purposes without TB approval.
In the Initiative's first year (2002-03), the Department lapsed $1.6 million under Vote 1 and the entire $2.5 million under Vote 5 because of the late receipt of PSAT funding and the lack of terms and conditions for the legal aid funding.[6] Due to the nature of special purpose allotments, which restrict internal reallocation, and also as a result of the lapsed funds, the Department decided to contribute the projected portion of PSAT funds it could not use to the government's budget reallocation exercise. Since 2002-03, the demand for PSAT-related services has grown, but the Department had already committed PSAT funds for reallocation. As a result, there have been deficits in its PSAT budget for 2003-04 and 2005-06 in Vote 1.
[5] The figure is taken from the Department of Justice Canada (2006). Results-Based Management and Accountability Framework Public Safety and Anti-Terrorism Initiative.
[6] As the formative evaluation reports, the development of legal aid terms and conditions was not a priority due to the lack of PSAT-related legal aid cases. Department of Justice (2006). Results-based Management and Accountability Framework for the Public Safety and Anti-Terrorism Initiative.