Department of Justice Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

Drug and Driving: A Compendium of Research Studies


Annotated Sources (cont'd)

Canada

19. Adlaf, E.M., Mann, R.E. and Paglia, A. (2003). Drinking, cannabis use and driving among Ontario students. Canadian Medical Association Journal 168: 565-566.

Overview

Self-report survey of drug use and driving among Ontario students

Type of study, population(s) and proportion tested

  1. 1,846 students in grades 7 to 13 in Ontario
  2. 1,119 students in grades 10 to 13 with a driver’s licence
  3. 508 students in grades 10 to 13 with a driver’s licence

Drugs examined (threshold values for detection)

Method of testing and medium used

Ontario Students Drug Use Survey -- self-report survey

  1. How often in the past 12 months have you ridden in a vehicle with a drinking driver?
  2. How often in the past 12 months have you driven with one hour of having two or more drinks?
  3. How often in the past 12 months have you driven within an hour of using marijuana?

Other dependent variables

Findings (including statistical methods)

  1. 31.9% -- increased with grade (17.5% in grade 7; 43.4% in grade 13)
  2. 15.1% -- 20% male 8.9% female -- higher among those in grades 12 and 13
  3. 19.7% drove after using marijuana -- 24.5% among males; 13.7% females

20. Beirness, D.J., Simpson, H.M. and Desmond, K. (2003). The Road Safety Monitor2002. Drugs and Driving. Ottawa: Traffic Injury Research Foundation.

Overview

Telephone survey of drug use and driving among population of Canadian drivers

Type of study, population(s) and proportion tested

N=1,214 Canadian drivers age 16+

Random telephone survey

Drugs examined (threshold values for detection)

Method of testing and medium used

Self-reported use and driving

Other dependent variables

Driving after drinking

Findings (including statistical methods)

Males under 30 most likely to drive after drug use

One-third of those reporting driving after cannabis also reported driving after drinking

21. Beirness, D.J., Simpson, H.M. and Desmond, K. (2004). The Road Safety Monitor 2004. Drinking and Driving. Ottawa: Traffic Injury Research Foundation.

Overview

Telephone survey of drug use and driving among population of Canadian drivers

Type of study, population(s) and proportion tested

N=1,214 Canadian drivers age 16+

Random telephone survey

Drugs examined (threshold values for detection)

Method of testing and medium used

Self-report

Other dependent variables

Findings (including statistical methods)

2.1% reported driving after using cannabis

Increase from 1.5% two years ago

44% also reported driving after drinking

Most common among males < 30 years of age

22. Boase, P., Dawson, N. and Mann, R. (2004) Cannabis and road safety in Canada: Summary of information on cannabis found in drivers & recent legislative developments. In: J. Oliver, P. Williams and A. Clayton (Eds.) Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety (CD). Glasgow: Scottish Executive.

Overview

Review of cannabis use and driving in Canada

Type of study, population(s) and proportion tested

Various
Review of survey literature

Drugs examined (threshold values for detection)

Method of testing and medium used

Self reported cannabis use
Self reported driving after cannabis use

Other dependent variables

Findings (including statistical methods)

Prevalence of use has increased

Prevalence of driving after cannabis use currently 1.9% to 2.1%

Higher among students and appears to be increasing

23. Bramness, J. G., Skurtveit, S., and Mørland, J. (2002) Clinical impairment of benzodiazepines – Relation between benzodiazepine concentration and impairment in apprehended drivers. In D. R. Mayhew and C. Dussault (Eds.) Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety. Quebec: Société de l’Assurance Automobile du Québec.

Overview

Assessment of clinical impairment of benzodiazepine positive drivers in Norway

Type of study, population(s) and proportion tested

Drivers, suspected of driving under the influence between 1987 and 1998, positive for only one benzodiazepine (n=818)

Comparison group of drivers positive only for alcohol in 1987 (n=10,759)

Drugs examined (threshold values for detection)

Method of testing and medium used

Blood samples
Clinical Test for Drunkenness (CTD)

Other dependent variables

Findings (including statistical methods)

Within the benzodiazepine group, 81% were "impaired"

"Impaired" drivers had significantly higher concentrations of diazepam and oxazepam

Within the alcohol group, 91% were "impaired"

OR for being determined "impaired" significantly rose as dose increased from therapeutic to mildly elevated (1.6), to moderately elevated (3.7), to highly elevated (4.1)

Same trend is true for alcohol group, though a greater OR was found for the highly elevated dose (10.5)