Le point de vue de l'enfant dans la médiation et les autres méthodes de règlement extrajudiciaire des différends dans les cas de séparation et de divorce : une analyse documentaire

Bibliographie

  • Amato, Paul R. 2001. « Children of divorce in the 1990's: An update of the Amato & Keith meta-analysis ». Journal of Family Psychology, 15, p. 355-365.
  • Amato, Paul R. 2006. Children of divorce: What we know and what we need to know. Document présenté à la International Conference on Children and divorce, University of East Anglia, Norwich, R.-U.
  • Arbuthnot, J. et Gordon, D.A. 1996. Does mandatory divorce education for parents work? Family & Conciliation Courts Review, 34, p. 60-81.
  • Ariès, Philippe. 1960. L'enfant et la vie familiale sous l'Ancien Régime. Paris, Librairie Plon.
  • Atwood, Barbara, A. 2003. « The child's voice in custody litigation: An empirical survey and suggestions for Reform ». Arizona Law Review, 45, p. 628-670.
  • Austin, G., Jaffe, P. et Hurley, P. 1991. « Incorporating children's needs and views in alternative dispute resolution. Approaches ». Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 8(1), p. 69-79.
  • Bacon, B.L. et McKenzie, B. 2004. « Parent education after separation/divorce: Impact of the level of parental conflict on Outcomes ». Family Court Review, 42, p. 85-98.
  • Bala, Nicholas. 2004. « Assessments for postseparation parenting disputes in Canada ». Family Court Review, 42(3), p.485-510.
  • Bala, Nicholas. 2005. « Tippins and Wittman asked the wrong question: Evaluators may not be ‘experts’, But they can express best interests opinions ». Family Court Review, 43(4), p. 554‑562.
  • Bala, N., Talwar, V. et Harris, J. 2005. « The voice of children in Canadian Family Law Cases ». Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 24(3), p. 221-279.
  • Bessner, Rhonda. 2002. Le point de vue des enfants dans les procédures en matière de divorce, de garde et de droit de visite. Section de la famille, des enfants et des adolescents, ministère de la Justice Canada, 2002-FCY-1F.
  • Biddulph, F., Biddulph, J. et Biddulph, C. 2003. The complexity of community and family influences on children's achievement in New Zealand: Best evidence synthesis. Wellington : Ministry of Education.
  • Birnbaum, Rachel. 2005. « Hearing the voices of lawyers and clinical investigators who represent children in custody and access disputes ». Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 24(3), p. 281-303.
  • Birnbaum, Rachel. 2007. Être à l'écoute des jeunes au sujet de leurs besoins et préférences en matière d'information relative à la séparation ou au divorce de leurs parents. Section de la famille, des enfants et des adolescents, ministère de la Justice Canada.
  • Birnbaum, Rachel. 2007. Recherche sur les ressources pour les enfants et les jeunes dont les parents se séparent ou divorcent : analyse documentaire. Section de la famille, des enfants et des adolescents, ministère de la Justice du Canada.
  • Birnbaum, Rachel. 2008. Child legal representation: Hearing the voices from the child's perspective about the process. Thèse de maitrise en droit, non publiée.
  • Birnbaum, R., Fidler, B.J. et Kavassalis, K. 2008. Child custody assessments: A resource guide for mental health and legal professionals. Thomson Carswell Publishing.
  • Birnbaum, R. et Moyal, D. 2002. « Visitation based disputes arising on separation and divorce ». Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 20(1), p. 37-53.
  • Birnbaum, R. et Moyal, D. 2003. « How social workers and lawyers collaborate to promote resolution in the interests of children: The interface between law in theory and law in action ». Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 21(3), p. 379-395.
  • Birnbaum, R. et Radovanovic, H. 1999. « Brief intervention model for access-based post separation disputes: Family and court Outcomes ». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 37(4), p. 504-513.
  • Boshier, P. et Steel-Baker, D. 2007. « Invisible parties: Listening to children ». Family Court Review, 45(4), p. 548-559.
  • Boyan, S. M. et Termini, A. 2004. The psychotherapist as parent coordinator in high conflict divorce: Strategies and techniques. New York: The Haworth Clinical Practice Press.
  • Brennan, Samantha. 2002. « Children's choices or children's interests: Which do their rights protect? ». Dans Colin Macleod et David Archard (dir.). The Moral and Political Status of Children: New Essays, (p. 53-69). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Brown, Carole. 1996. « Involving children in decision making without making them the decision makers ». Rapport présenté à un séminaire des directeurs des services de counseling judiciaire et des superviseurs des cas, Victor Harbour, SA. Cité dans Chisholm, Richard, 1998, « Children's participation in litigation ». Third National Family Court Conference.
  • Burns, C. E. et Goldberg, D. L. 2004. Representing children in custody and access proceedings. National Judicial Institute Family Law Seminar, Halifax, Nouvelle-Écosse, 11-13 février.
  • Butler, I., Scanlon, L., Robinson, M., Douglas, G. et Murch, M. 2002. « Children's involvement in their parents' divorce: Implications for practice ». Children and Society, 16(2), p. 89-102.
  • Butler, I., Scanlon, L., Robinson, M., Douglas, G. et Murch, M. 2003. Divorcing children: Children's experience of their parents' divorce. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
  • Camacho, Agnes, Z.V. 2006. « Applying principles of child-centered approach in working with and for children: Psychosocial support and children's rights resources center Phillipines ». Ébauche de rapport présentée à l'International Interdisciplinary Course on Children's Rights, groupe de discussion travaillant sur le thème « Working with and through university programs—Instructive models and experiences », du 27 novembre au 1er décembre 2006, Ghent, Belgique.
  • Carter, S., Haave, B. et Vandersteen, S. (2006). Family restructuring therapy for high conflict families and estranged children. Présenté à la 43e conférence annuelle de l'Association of Family & Conciliation Courts, Tampa, Floride.
  • Cashmore, Judith. 2003. « Children's participation in family law matters », dans C. Hallett et A. Prout (dir.) Hearing the voices of children: Social policy for a new century. (p. 158-157). Bodmin Routledge: Falmer Press.
  • Cashmore, J. et Parkinson, P. 2007. « What responsibility do courts have to hear children's voices? ». International Journal of Children's Rights, 15, p.43-60.
  • Cashmore, J. et Parkinson, P. 2008. « Children's and parents' perceptions on children's participation in decision making after parental separation and divorce », Family Court Review, 46(1), p. 91-104.
  • Christensen, P.A. et James, A. 2000. Research with children: Perspectives and practices. Routledge Publishing.
  • Coates, C.A., Deutsch, R., Starnes, H., Sullivan, M.J. et Sydlik, B. 2004. « Parenting coordination for high conflict families », Family Court Review, 42(2), p. 246‑262.
  • Cummings, E.M. et Davies, P. 2002. « Effects of marital conflict on children: Recent advances and emerging themes in process-oriented research ». Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(1), p. 31‑63.
  • Davies, Christine, D. 2004. « Access to justice for children: The voice of the child in child custody and access Disputes ». Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 22(2), p. 153-175.
  • Douglas, G., Murch, M., Miles, L. et Scanlon, L. 2006. Research into the operation of Rule 9.5 of the Family Proceedings Rules (Version PDF), (en anglais seulement), 1991.
  • Drapkin, R. et Bienenfeld, F. 1985. « The power of including children in chld cutsody mediation ». Journal of Divorce, 8(3/4), p. 63-94.
  • Dunn, J. et Deater-Deckard, K. 2001. Children's views of their changing families. York: York Publishing Services.
  • Eekelaar, John. 1992. « The importance of thinking that children have rights ». Dans P. Alston, S. Parker, et J. Seymour (dir.). Children, Rights and the Law. (p. 221-235). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Elrod, Linda, D. 2007. « Client-directed lawyers for children: It is the "right" thing to do ». Pace Law Review, 27, p. 869-920.
  • Emery, Robert E. 2001. « Interparental conflict and social policy ». Dans J. Grych et F. Fincham (dir.). Interparental conflict and child development. (p. 417-439). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Emery, Robert E. 2003. « Children's voices: Listening —And deciding —Is an adult responsibility ». Arizona Law Review, 45, p. 621-627.
  • Emery, R.E., Matthews, S.G. et Kitzmann, M. 1994. « Child custody mediation and litigation: Parents' satisfaction and functioning one year after settlement ». Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, p. 124-129.
  • Emery, R.E., Matthews, S.G. et Wyer, M.M. 1991. « Child custody mediation and litigation: Further evidence on the differing views of mothers and fathers ». Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, p. 410-418.
  • Emery, R.E., Sbarra, D. et Grover, T. 2005. « Divorce mediation: Research and reflections ». Family Court Review, 43(1), p. 22-37.
  • Fairman, Christopher, M. 2007. « Growing pains: Collaborative law and the challenge of legal ethics » (En anglais seulement). Public Law and Legal Theory, Working Paper Series, #109, Center for Interdisciplinary Law and Policy Studies.
  • Fidler, B. J. et Epstein, P. Sous presse « Parenting coordination in Canada: An overview of legal and practice issues ». Journal of Child Custody.
  • Finman, S., Frazier, M.E., Silver, D. et Starnes, H. 2006. Innovations in family court dispute resolution. Rapport présenté à la 43e conférence annuelle de l'Association of Family and Conciliation Courts. Tampa Bay, Floride.
  • Focus Consultants. 2008. « An evaluation of, The Hear the Child Interview Process (Based on Parent and Child Feedback) ». Menée pour l'International Institute For Child Rights and Development (IICRD), Victoria, Colombie-Britannique.
  • Folberg, Jay. 1983. « A mediation overview: History, and dimensions of practice ». Mediation Quarterly, 1, p. 3‑13.
  • Folberg, J., Milne, A.L. et Salem, P. 2004. Divorce and family mediation: Models, techniques, and applications. The Guilford Press, New York, Londres.
  • Folberg, J. et Taylor A. 1984. Mediation: A comprehensive guide to resolving conflict without litigation. Jossey‑Bass, San Francisco.
  • Fombad, Charles, M. 2005. « Protecting children's rights in social science research in Botswana: Some ethical and legal dilemmas ». International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 19, p. 102‑120.
  • Freeman, Michael. 1997. The moral status of children: Essays on the rights of the child. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff (Klower Law International).
  • Gamache, Susan. 2005. « Collaborative practice: A new opportunity to address children's best interest in Divorce ». Louisiana Law Review, 65, p. 1455-1487.
  • Gamache, Susan. 2006. Family Law Basics II: The child specialist in collaborative separation and divorce. Document préparé pour la Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia.
  • Garrity, C.B. et Baris, M.A. 1994. Caught in the middle: Protecting the children of high-conflict divorce. New York: Lexington.
  • Garwood, Fiona. 1990. « Children in conciliation: The experience of involving children in conciliation ». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 28(1), p. 43-51.
  • Gentry, Deborah. 1997. « Including children in divorce mediation and education: Potential benefits and Concerns ». Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 307‑315.
  • Gilmour, Glen, A. 2004. Séparation et divorce très conflictuels : options à examiner. Présenté à la Section de la famille, des enfants et des adolescents, ministère de la Justice Canada.
  • Goldberg, Dan, L. 2004. « The lawyer's role ». Dans Nicholas Bala, Michael Kim Zapf, R. James Williams, Robin Vogl et Joseph, P. Hornick. (p. 245-289). Canadian Child Welfare Law: Children, Families and the State. Deuxième édition. Thompson Educational Publishing, Inc. Toronto.
  • Goldson, Jill. 2006. Hello, I'm a voice, let me talk: Child-inclusive mediation in family separation (en anglais seulement). Center for child and family policy research, Auckland University.
  • Graham, A. et Fitzgerald, R. 2005. « Taking account of the "To and Fro" of children's experiences in family law » (en anglais seulement).
  • Grych, John, H. 2005. « Interparental conflict as a risk factor for child maladjustment: Implications for the development of prevention programs ». Family Court Review, 43(1), p. 97-108.
  • Guggenheim, Martin. 2003. « Maximizing strategies for pressuring adults to do right by children ». Arizona Law Review, 45, p. 764-781.
  • Hart, Roger, A. 1992. Children's participation, from tokenism to citizenship. Florence: UNICEF.
  • Hawthorne, J., Jessop, J., Pryor, J. et Richards, M. 2003. Supporting children through family change: A review of interventions and services for children of divorcing and separating parents. Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge. York Publishing Services Ltd. Layerthorpe, York.
  • Haynes, John, M. 1980. « Managing conflict: The role of the mediator ». Conciliation Courts Review, 18(2), p 9-13.
  • Hewlett, Bill. 2007. « Accessing the parental mind through the heart: A case study in child-inclusive Mediation ». Journal of Family Studies, 13(1), p. 94-103.
  • Hill, M., Lockyer, A., Morton, P., Batchelor, S. et Scott, J. 2000. The role of safeguarders in Scotland (Version PDF), (en anglais seulement). Centre for the Child and Society and Department of Politics, University of Glasgow.
  • Homrich, A. M., Muenzenmeyer Glover, M. et White, A.B. 2004. « Program profile: The court care center for divorcing families ». Family Court Review, 41(1), p. 141-161.
  • Irving, Howard, H. 1980. Divorce mediation: The rational alternative. Personal Library, Toronto.
  • Jaffe, P.G., Johnston, J.R., Crooks, C.V. et Bala, N. 2008. « Custody disputes involving allegations of domestic violence: The need for differentiated approaches to parenting plans ». Family Court Review, sous presse.
  • James, A., Jenks, C. et Prout, A. 1998. Theorising Childhood. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Jamison, A. et Gilbert, L. 2000. « Facilitating children's voices in the community and government ». Dans A. Smith, N. Taylor, et M. Gollop (dir.), Children's voices: Research, policy and practice. (p. 181-201). Auckland: Longman.
  • Johnston, J.R. et Campbell, L.G. 1988. Impasses of divorce: The dynamics and resolution of family conflict. New York: Free Press.
  • Johnston, J.R. et Roseby, V. 1997. In the name of the child: A developmental approach to understanding and helping children of conflicted and violent divorce. New York: The Free Press.
  • Kaganas, F. et Diduck, A. 2004. « Incomplete citizens: Changing images of post-separation children ». The Modern Law Review, 67(6), p. 959-981.
  • Kelly, Joan, B. 2002. « Psychological and legal interventions for parents and children in custody and access disputes: Current research and practice ». Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 10, p. 129-163.
  • Kelly, Joan, B. 2003a. « Parents with enduring child disputes: Focused interventions with parents in enduring Disputes ». Journal of Family Studies, 9(1), p. 51-62.
  • Kelly, Joan, B. 2003b. « Parents with enduring child disputes: Multiple pathways to enduring disputes ». Journal of Family Studies, 9(1), p. 37-50.
  • Kelly, Joan, B. 2004. « Family mediation research: Is there empirical support for the field ». Conflict Resolution Quarterly, ½, p. 3-35.
  • Kelly, J.B. et Emery, R.E. 2003. « Children's adjustment following divorce: Risk and resilience perspectives ». Family Relations, 52, p. 352-362.
  • Lamb, Michael, E. 2002-2003. « Placing children's interests first: Developmentally appropriate parenting plans ». Journal of Social Policy and Law, 10, p. 98-119.
  • Landau, Barbara. 2006. « What role, if any, should children have when parents separate? » (en anglais seulement).
  • Landau, B., Wolfson, L. et Landau, N. 2005. Family mediation and collaborative practice handbook. LexisNexis, Butterworths (4th Edition).
  • Lansdown, Gerison. 2001. Promouvoir la participation des enfants au processus décisionnel démocratique (Version PDF). UNICEF Insight Innocenti.
  • Lansdown, Gerison. 2005. Les capacités évolutives de l'enfant (Version PDF). UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
  • Lansky, D.T., Manley, E.E., Swift, L.H. et Williams, M. 1995. « The role of children in divorce mediation ». Dans Academy of Family Mediators, Workshop proceedings book: 1995 Annual Conference. (p. 31-33). Golden Valley, MN: Academy of Family Mediators.
  • Macfarlane, Julie. 2005. Le nouveau phénomène du droit de la famille collaborative (DFC) : étude de cas qualitative. Section de la famille, des enfants et des adolescents, ministère de la Justice Canada, 2005-FCY-1F.
  • Mackay, Marcus. 2001. Through a child's eyes: Child inclusive practice in family relationship services. Department of Family and Community Services and the Attorney General's Department, Australie, Human Development Consulting Pty, Ltd.
  • Mantle, Greg. 2001b. « Involving children in court-based family mediation ». Representing Children, 14, p. 187‑196.
  • Mantle, G., Leslie, J., Parsons, S., Plenty, J. et Shaffer, R. 2006. « Establishing children's wishes and feelings for family court reports: The significance attached to the age of the child ». Childhood, p. 499-518.
  • Marchant, R. et Kirby, P. 2004. « The participation of young children: Communication, consultation and involvement ». Dans Young children's citizenship: Ideas into practice, Bren Neale (dir.), (p. 92‑163). Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • Markan, L.K. et Weinstock, D.K. 2005. « Expanding forensically informed evaluations and therapeutic interventions in family Court ». Family Court Review, 43(3), p. 466-480.
  • Marshall, K., Tisdall, E. K. M. et Cleland, A. 2002. The voice of the child under the Children (Scotland) Act 1995: Giving due regard to children's views in all matters that affect them (Version PDF), (en anglais seulement). Volume 2, Feasibility Study.
  • Martin, M.K. et Kowalchuk, M. 2007. Brief consultation: The voice of the child. Manuscrit non publié, trouvé dans les dossiers du Service de conciliation familiale, Winnipeg, Manitoba.
  • May, V. et Smart, C. 2004. « Silence in court?— Hearing children in residence and contact disputes ». Child and Family Law Quarterly, 16(3), p. 1-16.
  • Mayer, Bernard. 2004. « Facilitative mediation ». Dans J. Folberg, Ann Milne et Peter Salem (dir.). Divorce and family mediation: Models, techniques, and applications. (p. 29-52). The Guilford Press, New York, Londres.
  • McIntosh, Jennifer, E. 2000. « Child-inclusive divorce mediation: Report on a qualitative research study ». Mediation Quarterly, 18(1), p. 55-69.
  • McIntosh, Jennifer, E. 2003. « Enduring conflict in parental separation: Pathways of impact on child development ». Journal of Family Studies, 9(1), p. 63-80.
  • McIntosh, Jennifer, E. 2005. « Because it's kids: Building a secure parenting base after separation ». Journal of Family Studies, 11(1), p. 123-146.
  • McIntosh, Jennifer, E. 2006. Final report to the Family Court of Australia, the children's cases pilot project: An exploratory study of impacts on parenting capacity and child well-being. Family Transitions, Victoria, Australie.
  • McIntosh, Jennifer, E. 2007. « Child inclusion as a principle and as evidence-based practice: Applications to family law services and related sectors ». AFRC Issues: Australian Family Relationships Clearinghouse, 1.
  • McIntosh, J. E., Bryant, D. et Murray, K. 2008. « Evidence of a different nature: The child-responsive and less adversarial initiatives of the family court of Australia ». Family Court Review, 46(1), p. 125-136.
  • McIntosh, J.E. et Deacon-Wood, H.B. 2003.« Group interventions for separated parents in entrenched conflict: An exploration of evidence-based frameworks ». Journal of Family Studies, 9(2), p. 187-199.
  • McIntosh, J. E. et Long, C. M. 2005. « Current findings on Australian children in postseparation disputes: Outer conflict, inner discord ». Journal of Family Studies, 11(1), p. 99-109.
  • McIntosh, J. E. et Long, C. M. 2006. Children beyond dispute: A prospective study of outcomes from child focused and child inclusive post-separation family dispute resolution (Version PDF), (en anglais seulement), Final Report. Canberra: Australian Government Attorney General's Department.
  • McIntosh, J. E. et Long, C. M. 2007. The child responsive program, operating within less adversarial trial: A follow-up study of parent and child outcomes. Rapport présenté à la Family Court of Australia, Family Transitions.
  • McIntosh, J., E. Long, C.M. et Moloney, L. 2004. « Child-focused and child-inclusive mediation: A comparative study of outcomes ». Journal of Family Studies, 10(1), p. 87-95.
  • McIntosh, J.E., Wells, Y.D. et Long, C.M. 2007. « Child-focused and child-inclusive family law dispute resolution: One year findings from a prospective study of outcomes ». Journal of Family Studies, 13(1), p. 8-25.
  • McIntosh, J.E., Wells, Y.D., Smyth, B.M. et Long, C.M. 2008. « Child-focused and child-inclusive divorce mediation: Comparative outcomes from a prospective study of postseparation adjustment ». Family Court Review, 46(1), p. 105‑124.
  • Melton, Gary, B. 1999. « Parents and children: Legal reform to facilitate children's participation ». American Psychologist, 54, p. 935-942.
  • Ministère de la Justice Canada. 2007. Mes parents se séparent ou divorcent : qu'est-ce que ça veut dire pour moi? Disponible en ligne dans les deux langues officielles.
  • Ministry of Attorney General, Colombie-Britannique. 2003. « The involvement of children in divorce and custody mediation: A literature review »(Version PDF), (en anglais seulement). Ministry of Attorney General, Justice Services Branch, Family Justice Services Division.
  • Ministry of Attorney General Justice Services Branch, Civil and Family Law Policy Review, 2007. Children's Participation, Background Paper (Version PDF), (en anglais seulement).
  • Ministry of Social Development. 2003. Involving Children: A guide to engaging children in decision-making (Version PDF), (en anglais seulement).
  • Moloney, Lawrie.2005. « Children's voices: Reflections on the telling and the listening ». Journal of Family Studies, 11(2), p. 216-226.
  • Moloney, Lawrie. 2006. « Child-sensitive practices in high-conflict parenting disputes: A 30-year road to serious Reform ». Journal of Family Studies, 12(1), p. 37-56.
  • Moloney, L. et McIntosh, J.E. 2004. « Child-responsive practices in Australian family law: Past problems and future Directions ». Journal of Family Studies, 10(1), p. 71-86.
  • Morrow, Virginia. 1998. Understanding families: Children's perspectives. Londres, National Children's Bureau.
  • Morrow, Virginia. 1999. « We are people too: Children's and young people's perspectives on children's rights and decision-making in England ». International Journal of Children's Rights, 7, p. 455‑475.
  • Morrow, V. et Richards, M. 1996. « The ethics of social research with children: An overview ». Children and Society, 10, p. 934-944.
  • Mosten, Forrest, S. 1997. The complete guide to mediation. American Bar Association.
  • Murch, Mervyn. 2005. « The voice of the child in private law proceedings in England and Wales », International Family Law, 8(18), p. 1369-5762.
  • Murch, M., Douglas, G., Scanlan, L., Perry, A., Lisles, C., Bader, K. et Borkowski. M.1998. Safeguarding children's welfare in uncontentious divorce: A study of s.41 of the Matrimonial Causes Act. Report to the Lord Chancelllor's Department. Cardiff University.
  • Neale, Bren. 2002. « Dialogues with children: Children, divorce and citizenship ». Childhood, 9(4), p. 455-475.
  • Neale, B. et Smart, C. 2001. Good to talk? Conversations with children after divorce. London Young Voice. East Molessy.
  • O'Connor, Pauline. 2004. Les programmes de participation et de soutien à l'intention des enfants dont les parents se séparent ou divorcent. Section de la famille, des enfants et des adolescents, ministère de la Justice Canada (2004-FCY-2F).
  • O'Quigley, Ann. 2000. Listening to children's views: The findings and recommendations of recent research. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • Parkinson, P. et Cashmore, J. 2007. Judicial conversations with children in parenting disputes: The views of Australian judges. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07/07 (en anglais seulement).
  • Parkinson, P., Cashmore, J. et Single, J. 2005. « Adolescents' views on the fairness of parenting and financial arrangements after separation », Family Court Review, 43(3), p. 429-444.
  • Parkinson, P., Cashmore, J. et Single, J. 2007. Parents' and children's views on talking to judges in parenting disputes in Australia. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07/08 (en anglais seulement).
  • Pearson, Yvonne. 2006. « Early neutral evaluations: Applications to custody and parenting time cases program development and implementation in Hennepin County, Minnesota ». Family Court Review, 44(4), p. 672-682.
  • Pike, L.T. et Murphy, P.T. 2006. « Invisible parties: Listening to children—A social science perspective » (en anglais seulement). Rapport présenté à la Australian Family Law Conference: Perth, Australie.
  • Prout, A. et James, A. 1990. « A new paradigm for the sociology of childhood? ». Dans James et A. Prout (dir.). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. (p. 7-34). Baskingstoke, Bristol: Falmer Press.
  • Pryor, J. et Emery, R.E. 2004. « Children of divorce ». Dans P.B. Pufall et R.P. Unsworth (dir.), Rethinking Childhood.
  • Pryor, J. et Rodgers, B. 2001. Children in changing families: Life after parental separation. Blackwell, Oxford.
  • Raitt, Fiona, E. 2007. « Hearing children in family law proceedings: Can judges make a difference ». Child and Family Law Quarterly, 19(2), p. 1-20.
  • Reeves, Crystal. 2008. Family Relations Act Reform Project: A Final Report. Rapport préparé par le SPARC BC.
  • Richards, M.P.M. et Stark, C. 2000. « Children, parenting and information meetings ». Family Law, 30, p. 484-488.
  • Roche, Jeremy. 1999. « Children and divorce: A private affair? ». Dans Shelley Day Sclater et Christine Piper, Undercurrents of Divorce, Aldershot, Dartmouth Publishing.
  • Salem, P., Kulak, D. et Deutsch, R.M. 2007. « Triaging family court services: The Connecticut Judicial Branch's Family Civil Intake Screen ». Pace Law Review, 27(4), p. 101-146.
  • Sanchez, E.A. et Kibler-Sanchez, S. 2004. « Empowering children in mediation: An intervention model ». Family Court Review, 42(3), p. 554-575.
  • Saposnek, Donald, T. 1983. Mediating child custody disputes. Jossey-Bass Publishing.
  • Saposnek, Donald, T. 1998. Mediating child custody disputes: Revised Edition. Jossey-Bass Publishing.
  • Saposnek, Donald, T. 2004. « Working with children in mediation ». Dans Jay Folberg, Ann Milne et Peter Salem (dir.) Divorce and Family Mediation: Models, Techniques and Applications. (p. 155-179). Guilford Press. New York.
  • Sbarra, D.A. et Emery, R.E. 2008. « Deeper into divorce: Using actor-partner analyses to explore systemic differences in coparenting conflict following custody dispute resolution ». Journal of Family Psychology, 22(1), p. 144-152.
  • Schoffer, Melissa J. 2005. « Bringing children to the mediation table: Defining a child's best interests in divorce Mediation ». Family Court Review, 43(2), p. 323-338.
  • Shienvold, Arnold. 2004. « Hybrid processes ». Dans Folberg, J., Milne, A.L. et Salem, P. (dir.) Divorce and family mediation: Models, techniques, and applications. (p. 112-126). The Guilford Press, New York, Londres.
  • Shier, Harry. 2001. « Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities, and obligations. A new model for enhancing children's participation in decision-making ». Children and Society, 15, p. 107-117.
  • Simpson, Bob. 1991. «  The Children Act of 1989 and the voice of the child in family conciliation ». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 29(4), p. 385-397.
  • Sinclair, Ruth. 2004. « Participation in practice: making it meaningful, effective and sustainable ». Children in Society, 18, p. 106-118.
  • Smart, Carol. 2002. « From children's shoes to children's voices ». Family Court Review, 40(3), p. 307 319.
  • Smart, Carol. 2004. « Equal shares: Rights for fathers or recognition for children ». Critical Social Policy, 24(4), p. 484-503.
  • Smart, C. and Neale, B. 2000. « It's my life too—Children's perspectives on post-divorce parenting ». Family Law, 30, p. 160-168.
  • Smart, C., Neale, B. et Wade, A. 2001. The changing experience of childhood: families and divorce. Oxford, R.-U., Polity Press.
  • Smart, C., Wade, A. et Neale, B. 1999. « Objects of concern? Children and divorce ». Child and Family Law Quarterly, 11(4), p. 365-376.
  • Smith, Anne, B. 2007. « Children as social actors: An introduction ». International Journal of Children's Rights, 15, p.1-4.
  • Smith, A.B. et Gollop, M. 2001. « What children think separating parents should know ». New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 30(1), p. 23-30.
  • Smith, A.B., Gollop, M. et Taylor, N. 2000. « Children's perspectives of their parent's separation ». Child and Family Law Quarterly, 12(4), p. 34-38.
  • Smith, A.B., Taylor, N.J. et Tapp, P. 2003. « Rethinking children's involvement in decision-making after parental separation ». Childhood, 10(2), p. 201-216.
  • Strategic Partners. 1998. Child-inclusive practice in family and child counseling and family and child mediation. Commonwealth of Australia. Department of Family and Community Services.
  • Sydlik, B. et Phelan, A.B. 1999. Interventions for high conflict families: A national perspective. Office of the State Court Administrator, Oregon Judicial Department.
  • Taylor, N.J., Smith, A.B. et Nairn, K. 2001. « Rights important to young people: Secondary student and staff perspectives ». The International Journal of Children's Rights, 9(2), p. 137‑156.
  • Taylor, N.J., Smith, A.B. et Tapp, P. 1999. Children, family law and family conflict: Subdued voices.
  • Tessler, Pauline. 1999. « Collaborative law: A new paradigm for divorce lawyers ». Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15(4), p. 967-1000.
  • Timms, Judith. 2003. « The silent majority—The position of children involved in the divorce and separation of their parents ». Child Care in Practice, 9(2), p. 162-175.
  • Tippins, T.A. et Wittman, J.P. 2005. « Empirical and ethical problems with custody recommendations: A call for clinical humility and judicial vigilance ». Family Court Review, 43(2), p. 193-222.
  • Tisdall, K., Baker, R., Marshall, K. et Cleland, A. 2002. Voice of the child under the Children (Scotland) Act 1995: Giving due regard to children's views in all matters that affect them, Volume 1: Mapping Paper, Edimbourg: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.
  • Thomas, N. et O'Kane, C. 1998. « When children's wishes and feelings clash with their ‘best interests’ ». The International Journal of Children's Rights, 6, p. 137-154.
  • Trinder, Liz. 1997. « Competing constructions of childhood: Children's rights and children's wishes in Divorce ». Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 19(3), p. 291-305.
  • Trinder, L. et Kellett, J. 2007. « Fairness, efficiency and effectiveness in court-based dispute resolution schemes in England ». International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 21, p. 322-340.
  • Wade, A. et Smart, C. 2002. Facing family change: Children's circumstances, strategies and resources. York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • Walker, Janet. 2001. Information meetings and associated provisions within the Family Law Act 1966: Summary of final evaluation report. Londres: Lord Chancellor's Department.
  • Warshak, Richard A. 2003. « Payoffs and pitfalls of listening to children ». Family Relations, 52, p. 373-384.
  • Webb, Stu. 2000. « Collaborative law: An alternative for attorneys suffering "family law burnout" ». Matrimonial Strategist, 18, p. 7-18.
  • Williams, Suzanne. 2006. Through the eyes of young people: meaningful child participation in family court processes.
  • Williams, S. et Helland, J. 2007. Hear The Child Interviews, Kelowna pilot evaluation.
  • Woodhouse, Barbara. 2000. « Children's rights. Public law and legal theory: Research papers series ».
  • Wyness, Michael. 2006. Children and society: An introduction to the sociology of childhood. Palgrave Macmillan
  • Yingling, Lynelle, C. 2005. « Texas chapter child's voice research project », AFCC Newsletter, p. 8-10.
Date de modification :