Victim Participation in the Plea Negotiation Process in canada

Cases Sited

Cases Sited

Canada

  • Boudreau v. Benaiah (2000), 142 C.C.C. (3rd) 97 (Ont. C.A.).
  • R. v. Bates (2000), 146 C.C.C. (3d) 321 (Ont. C.A.).
  • R. v. Bezdan, [2001] B.C.C.A. 215.
  • R. v. Bremner (2000), 146 C.C.C. (3d) 59 (B.C.C.A.).
  • R. v. Bunn, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 183.
  • R. v. Burlingham (1995), 97 C.C.C. (3d) 385 (S.C.C.).
  • R. v. Dale (1998), B.C. Supreme Court, Docket # XO45396 (January 22nd, 1998).
  • R. v. Derksen (1999), 140 C.C.C. (3d) 184 (Sask. C.A.).
  • R. v. G.W.C., [2000] ABCA 333 (Alta. C.A.), Supplementary Reasons, [2001] A.B.C.A. 41 (Alta. C.A.).
  • R. v. Hoang, [2001] ABCA 87 ( Alta. C.A.).
  • R. v. Jackson, [2000] BCSC 94.
  • R. v. Jolivet, (2000), 144 C.C.C. (3d) 97 (S.C.C.).
  • R. v. Kennedy (1999), 140 C.C.C. (3d) 378 (Ont. C.A.).
  • R. v. J.A.F., [1997] No. 2503 (B.C. Prov. Ct.).
  • R. v. Jiany–Yaghooby [1998], B.C.J. No. 2389 (B.C.C.A.).
  • R. v. Labbe [2000] B.C.J. No. 184 (B.C.S.C.).
  • R. v. Lyons, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 309.
  • R. v. Miclash, (2000), BCSC 1430, appeal dismissed [2001] BCCA 266.
  • R. v. Morrisey, [2000], 2 S.C.R. 90.
  • R. v. M (C.A.) (1996), 105 C.C.C. (3d) 327 (S.C.C.).
  • R. v. Neale, [2000] BCCA 157.
  • R. v. Pawliuk, [2001] BCCA 13.
  • R. v. Power (1994), 89 C.C.C. (3d.) 1 (S.C.C.).
  • R. v. Sherlock (1998), 131 Man. R. (2d) 143 (C.A.).
  • R. v. Sweeney (1992), 71 C.C.C. (3d) 82 (B.C.C.A.).
  • R. v. Swietlinski (1994), 92 C.C.C. (3d) 449 (S.C.C.).
  • R. v. Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326.
  • R. v. Thornton, [2000] BCSC 1430.
  • R. v. Tran, [1999] B.C.C.A.) 367.

United States

  • Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63 (1977).
  • Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496 (1987).
  • Gioiosa v. United States, 684 F.2d 176,180 (1st Cir. 1982)
  • McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759 (1970)
  • Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991).
  • Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971)
  • South Carolina v. Gathers, 490 U.S. 805 (1989)
  • State v. Espinosa, [2001] AZ–QL131 (Court of Appeals, Arizona).
  • Tiemens v. United States, U.S. 724 F2d 160, 162 (5th Cir. 1991)
  • United States v.Badger, 925 F2d 101 (5th Cir. 1991).
  • United States v.Casallas, 59 F.3d 1173(11th Cir. 1995).
  • United States v. Damon, September 17th, 1999. No 96–4378 (4th Cir.1999).
  • United States v. Eirby [2001] CAI–QL310 (1st Cir.2001).
  • United States v. Fernandez, 960 F.2d 771 (9th Cir. 1991).
  • United States v. Henry, 113 F.3d 37 (5th Cir. 1997).
  • United States v. Hiltz, [2001] CAI–QL 285 (1st Cir. 2001).
  • United States v. Hyde, 520 U.S. 670 (1997).
  • United States v.Kennell, 15 F3d 134 (9th Cir. 1994).
  • United States v. McVeigh, 153 F.3d 116 (10th Cir. 1998).
  • United States v. Redondo–Lemos, 955 F2d 1296 (9th Cir: 1992).
  • United States v. Rodriguez, 197 F.3d 156 (5th Cir. 1999).
  • United States v. Thibodeaux, 811 F2d 847 (5th Cir. 1987).
  • United States v. Walton, 36 F.3d 32, 34 (7th Cir, 1994)
Date modified: