"Creating a Framework for the Wisdom of the Community:" Review of Victim Services in Nunavut, Northwest and Yukon Territories

4.0 Yukon Territory (cont'd)

4.0 Yukon Territory (cont'd)

4.5 Summary of Needs and Recommendations

4.5.1 Summary of Needs

As noted throughout this paper, most respondents felt that, compared with other Canadian regions, particularly northern jurisdictions, the Yukon Territory has a well developed continuum of professional services for victimized people. They note the increasing variety of specialized services for victimized individuals and the high volume of work being done by all agencies offering services to victims. Some respondents believe they are seeing the results of these efforts in greater sobriety, increased community awareness and increasing participation in healing events. Although there is no definitive way to prove it, it may be that lower rates of reported spousal assault, sexual assault and child abuse are the result of these services and interventions.

However, all respondents believe that there are still gaps, barriers and needs in the area of service provision to victimized individuals, families and communities. These challenges, as reported by respondents, and a summary of overall social conditions relating to victimization, are as follows:

4.5.2 Summary of Recommendations from Service Providers

Respondents offered a wide variety of recommendations throughout the interview process. These recommendations are summarized below under the headings of public awareness; specific program resources, community-based resources, for judicial system and law enforcement, and for legislation.

Public Awareness
Program Resources: Training
Program Resources: Capacity
Program Resources: Practical Support
Program Resources: New Programs
Program Resources: Community-Based Resources
Judicial System and Law Enforcement
Legislation

4.5.3 Additional Recommendations and Closing Comments

The above recommendations are self-explanatory but would perhaps not be complete without some reference, and further emphasis on other key issues.

Bridging the "Disconnect"

As stated and described throughout this paper, there are a relatively large number of well-developed, universally available services for victims in the Yukon, especially compared to other northern jurisdictions. These services, according to respondents and observers, base their work on an increasingly solid foundation of current information about trauma, victimization and recovery. Notwithstanding the recommendations detailed above, they provide a range of well-planned interventions available to most sectors of society.

However, and according to most respondents, it appears that First Nations service providers and public service providers work largely in isolation from each other. In addition, some First Nations service providers expressed that they, and their clients, feel some level of mistrust, and even abandonment, in terms of public government services and community agencies. They are not convinced these agencies and services understand them or have their best interests at heart. On the other hand, respondents working in public government programs and public agencies felt concerned about the difficulties they have felt around working in close tandem with First Nations programs.

Given that First Nations people are overrepresented as clients in many public government programs and community agencies, and given that the bulk of territorial financial resources for victimization rest with public government service providers and community agencies there would seem to be some need to bridge this ‘disconnect’ between First Nations service providers and clients, and public government and agency service providers.

Community-Based Services

Another area that perhaps needs to be addressed and emphasized separately is the issue of community-based services. Most respondents raised this issue, many of whom are providing community-based services and outreach programs. However, when 74% of the population lives in one place, Whitehorse, it is understandable that services are focused there. On the other hand, it isn’t possible to ignore the sense of isolation, and frustration about limited community-based resources, expressed by those service providers in smaller communities. They note the lack of victim recovery programs, women’s shelters, offender programs, aftercare programs, early intervention programs, youth programs and services to the elderly, and others with special needs, in their communities. They also referred to feeling cut off from other service providers as they attempted to deal single handedly with dysfunctional and entrenched community, social norms around interpersonal violence.

The ideal solution would be the provision in each community of the programs listed above. However, until more services are available in each community there are some steps that might be taken to reduce isolation and to fill programming and support gaps.[150]

Increased Community-Based Resources for Victims

Support to Community-Based Service Providers

Services for Cognitively Impaired Victims

A point that stands out in the interviews done with Yukon service providers is the apparently high number of cognitively impaired victims of crime. Some of these people are victimized on a regular basis. For example, the Family Violence Prevention Unit, Victim Services, estimates that 60% to 75% of the people they assist have some degree of cognitive impairment from trauma or Fetal Alcohol Syndrome. They also report that addictions are an issue in 75% of their cases.

Service providers are attempting to cope with this situation within the scope of their existing programs. And agencies such as the Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Society of Yukon are developing programs which target this segment of the victimized population.

As there apparently isn’t a great deal of formalized information about either the numbers or situations of these people the recommendation would be that formal research be carried out which examines the following:

The issue of cognitive impairment, amongst both victims and offenders, is a relatively recent area of awareness within the intervention, addictions, treatment, judicial, correctional and policing systems. Those groups with the most experience in this area, in this early stage of public understanding, are front line service providers who live and work on a daily basis with cognitively impaired individuals. This group includes foster parent associations, group home staff, residential treatment staff, organizations whose focus is cognitive impairment, teachers and the family and

friends of cognitively impaired persons. It would be appropriate for these more experienced service providers and family members to offer training, support and information to those government departments and agencies who find they are dealing with large numbers of cognitively impaired victimized individuals.

In the final analysis, it may be that existing and future programs designed to assist victims will have to make major adjustments to their intervention and treatment approach taking the possibility of cognitive impairment (along with culture, traumatic symptoms and many other factors listed throughout this paper) into consideration. It is also likely that victimized individuals with permanent brain damage will need long-term specialized services that are beyond the scope of existing formal services and informal support networks. Support to these individuals will involve a conscious multi-faceted and community-wide effort.