The Changing Face of Conditional Sentencing
Table of Contents
- Foreword
- 1. The Punitive Nature of the Conditional Sentence
- 2. The Conditional Sentence: A Canadian Approach to Sentencing Reform or, Doing the Time-Warp, Again
- 3. Conditional Sentences, Restorative Justice, Net-widening and Aboriginal Offenders
- 4. Discovering the Sphinx: Conditional Sentencing After the Supreme Court Judgement in R. V. Proulx
- 4.1 The nature of conditional sentence
- 4.2 Changes to the practice of conditional sentencing
- 4.3 Relationship between duration, conditions and response to unjustified breach
- 4.4 Effets of the Proulx judgment on the number of conditional sentences imposed
- 4.5 Conditional sentencing and public opinion
- 4.6 Transforming the penal landscape
- 5. Supreme Court of Canada Speaks on Conditional Sentences
- 5.1 Introduction
- 5.2 The supreme court speaks
- 5.3 The foreshadowing
- 5.4 The "Big Five" cases
- 5.5 The epilogue
- 5.6 To be continued…
- 6. The Changing Face of Conditional Sentencing: Sentencing as Seen From the Front Lines
- 6.1 Introduction
- 6.2 Discussion
- 6.3 Conclusion
- 7. Appellate Review of Sentencing
- 8. An Empirical Analysis of Conditional Sentensing in British Columbia
- 8.1 Introduction
- 8.2 Findings
- 8.3 Discussion
- 8.4 Conclusions
- Table I: CSO by category of offence
- Table II: CSO Length x Offence
- Table III: CSO and probation conditions imposed - Vancouver
- Table IV: Number and Type of Known Breaches - All Locations
- Table V: Specific Conditions Breached - Vancouver
- Table VI: Judicial Response - All Locations
- Date modified: