Quarterly Financial Report for the Quarter Ended, September 30, 2011

Statement outlining results, risks and significant changes in operations, personnel and programs

A) Introduction

Justice Mandate

The Mission of the Department of Justice is to support the Minister of Justice in working to ensure that Canada is a just and law abiding society with an accessible, efficient and fair system of justice; provide high-quality legal services and counsel to the government and to client departments and agencies; and promote respect for rights and freedoms, the law and the Constitution.

The Department of Justice is headed by the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. The responsibilities associated with the dual role of Minister of Justice and Attorney General are set out in the Department of Justice Act and some 49 other Acts of Parliament. The Department of Justice fulfills three distinctive roles within the Government of Canada, acting as a policy department with broad responsibilities for overseeing all matters relating to the administration of justice that fall within the federal domain; a provider of a range of legal advisory, litigation and legislative services to government departments and agencies; and a central agency responsible for supporting the Minister in advising Cabinet on all legal matters.

Further information on the mandate, roles, responsibilities and programs of the Department can be found in the Department of Justice 2011-2012 Main Estimates, available on the following website: www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/est-pre/20112012/me-bpd/docs/me-bpd-eng.pdf.

This quarterly financial report:

Basis of Presentation

This quarterly report has been prepared by management using an expenditure basis of accounting. The accompanying Statement of Authorities includes the department’s spending authorities granted by Parliament and those used by the department consistent with the Main Estimates and Supplementary Estimates for the 2011-2012 fiscal year. This quarterly report has been prepared using a special purpose financial reporting framework designed to meet financial information needs with respect to the use of spending authorities.

The authority of Parliament is required before moneys can be spent by the Government. Approvals are given in the form of annually approved limits through appropriation acts or through legislation in the form of statutory spending authority for specific purposes.

When Parliament is dissolved for the purposes of a general election, section 30 of the Financial Administration Act authorizes the Governor General, under certain conditions, to issue a special warrant authorizing the Government to withdraw funds from the Consolidated Revenue Fund. A special warrant is deemed to be an appropriation for the fiscal year in which it is issued.

The Department uses the full accrual method of accounting to prepare and present its annual departmental financial statements that are part of the departmental performance reporting process. However, the spending authorities voted by Parliament remain on an expenditure basis.

B) Highlights of fiscal quarter and fiscal year to date (YTD) results

This section highlights the significant items that contributed to the net increase in resources available for the year and the decrease in actual expenditures for the quarter ended September 30. It is noted that, as the primary legal services provider to other government departments and agencies, the Department has the authority to collect and spend revenue from legal services provided to other government departments and agencies. For the purposes of this report, these revenues are referenced as “Net Vote Authorities” or “Revenues netted against expenditures”.

Graph 1: Comparison of Budgetary Authorities and Expenditures as of September 30, 2010, and September 30, 2011

($Millions)

Graph 1: Comparison of Budgetary Authorities and Expenditures as of September 30, 2010, and September 30, 2011

Description of Graph 1

Graph 1 outlines the Department’s gross and net budgetary authorities and expenditures.

As of September 30, 2011 the Department had a total of $1,066.1 million of authorities including Net Vote Authority compared to $951.6 million as of September 30, 2010. Taking into consideration revenues netted against expenditures, the Department’s net budgetary authorities for the same period were $776.1 million in 2011-2012 and $736.6 million in 2010-2011.

In addition, the Department’s total gross expenditures as of September 30, 2011 were $339.9 million compared to $343.3 million at the same period in 2010-2011. For both fiscal years, taking into consideration the amounts of revenues the Department received as of September 30th ($111.5 million in 2011-2012 and $33.3 million in 2010-2011), total net expenditures were $227.8 million and $309.9 million respectively.

Significant Changes to Authorities

When compared to the second quarter of the previous fiscal year, the total net budgetary authorities available for the year had increased by $39.5 million compared to the same quarter last year, from $736.6 million to $776.1 million. As of this quarter, the Department realized increases of $16.7 million in Vote 1 – Net operating expenditures, $16.2 million in Statutory authorities and $6.6 million in Vote 5 – Grants and contributions.

As per the Statement of Authorities for the period ending September 30th 2011, major factors contributing to the net increase in total authorities available of $39.5 million are listed below:

For the second quarter (July 1st to September 30th 2011):

For the first quarter (April 1st to June 30th 2011):

In addition to the appropriations allocated to the Department through Main Estimates and Supplementary Estimates A, the Department also has Net Vote Authority (NVA), which entitles the Department to spend revenues collected from other government departments and agencies for legal advisory, litigation and legislative services provided. This authority includes an increase of $75.0 million for fiscal year 2011-2012 in response to anticipated increases in demand for legal services, for a total of $290.0 million compared to $215.0 million for the same period last year.

Significant Changes to Revenues Collected

Compared to the previous year, revenues collected in the second quarter, ending September 30, 2011, increased from $33.3 million to $111.5 million.  This represents an increase of 234.7% in total revenues collected at the end of the second quarter of this fiscal year. This change is principally attributed to the department increasing its frequency of billing and collections with client departments.

Significant Changes to Budgetary Expenditures

When compared to the second quarter of the previous fiscal year, the level of gross budgetary expenditures increased from $178.1 million to $182.8 million, or by 2.6%.

The department experienced a reduction in grants and contributions and an increase in personnel expenditures. Grants and contributions expenditures decreased by 22.0% ($4.5 million) in the second quarter of 2011-2012 mainly as a result of a delay in renewing a contribution agreement under the Youth Justice Services Program. Personnel expenditures show a net increase of 9.5% ($13.1 million) in comparison to the same period of the previous year. The Employee Benefit Plan rate increase as well as the one time Severance Pay disbursement for the Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) members, have contributed to an increase in salary expenditures in the second quarter of 2011-2012. The explanation of the major variances in expenditures for this quarter compare to last year’s can be found in the following Standard Objects:

The total net budgetary expenditures recorded in the quarter ending September 30, 2011, show a reduction $73.4 million, from $144.8 million to $71.3 million. This is principally attributed to the sizeable increase in collected revenues from $33.3 million in 2010-11 to $111.5 million in 2011-12.

C) Risks and Uncertainties

This Quarterly Financial Report reflects the results of the current fiscal period in relation to the Main Estimates, for which full supply was released on June 27, 2011, and the Supplementary Estimates A authorities. The Department had no requirements for the Supplementary Estimates B.

Budget 2010 announced that the operating budgets of departments would be frozen at their 2010-2011 levels for the fiscal years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013. Given the Department’s reliance on cost recovery and the associated fiscal restraint identified in Budget 2010, there is a risk that other government departments and agencies reduce requests for and funding associated with legal services from the Department of Justice. This is significant as the Department of Justice carries the salary and operating liability in providing legal services in an environment where future demands for legal services and revenues are uncertain.

Risk Drivers:

Justice Canada is continuously reviewing various options to mitigate these constraints in funding. Impacts on departmental activities have been managed through the following actions and mitigation strategies:

Budget 2011 launched a comprehensive one-year Strategic and Operating Review restraint exercise across all of government. This 2011-2012 review will focus on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations and programs. It is expected that savings as a result of the Strategic and Operating Review will be recorded in Budget 2012 and that budgets will be reduced for fiscal years 2012-2013 and thereafter. However, at this time, the nature and extent of any reductions are not known.

D) Significant changes in relation to operations, personnel and programs

Law Practice Model

The Department continues to implement the Law Practice Model, an initiative that aims to equip the Department with the right mix of counsel necessary to continue to deliver effective and efficient legal services.

Approval by Senior Officials

Approved by:

Original signed by Myles J. Kirvan
November 24, 2011

Myles J. Kirvan
Deputy Minister

Original signed by Daniel Schnob
November 24, 2011

Daniel Schnob
Chief Financial Officer


Ottawa, Canada

 

Statement of Authorities (unaudited)
(In thousands of dollars)
  Fiscal year 2011-2012 Fiscal year 2010-2011
  Total available for use for the year ending March 31, 2012 Used during the quarter ended September 30, 2011 Year to date used at quarter end Total available for use for the year ending March 31, 2011 Used during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 Year to date used at quarter end
Vote 1 - Operating expenditures 587,450 146,070 274,124 495,783 140,866 277,177
Less: Revenues netted against expenditures (290,000) (111,450) (112,214) (215,000) (33,300) (33,380)
Net Vote 1 operating expenditures 297,450 34,620 161,910 280,783 107,566 243,797
Vote 5 - Grants and contributions 395,699 16,001 24,411 389,095 20,506 32,681
Budgetary statutory authorities 82,912 20,726 41,451 66,711 16,709 33,431
TOTAL AUTHORITIES 776,061 71,347 227,772 736,589 144,781 309,909

 

Departmental budgetary expenditures by Standard Object (unaudited)
(In thousands of dollars)
  Fiscal year 2011-2012 Fiscal year 2010-2011
Expenditures Planned expenditures for the year ending March 31, 2012 Expended during the quarter ended September  30, 2011 Year to date used at quarter end Planned expenditures for the year ending March 31, 2011 Expended during the quarter
ended September 
30, 2010
Year to date used at quarter end
Personnel 547,587 150,503 287,860 473,565 137,429 276,680
Transportation and communications 25,368 3,542 6,854 19,607 3,856 7,415
Information 4,603 686 1,229 3,945 1,260 1,942
Professional and special services 59,038 6,617 11,735 40,823 10,683 16,680
Rentals 2,065 1,016 1,990 1,791 1,325 2,082
Repair and maintenance 8,963 2,176 2,609 2,830 713 1,591
Utilities, materials and supplies 6,715 1,249 1,849 5,134 1,101 1,862
Acquisition of land, buildings and works 350 870 0 0 0 0
Acquisition
of machinery and equipment
15,673 359 1,229 11,308 1,022 2,090
Transfer payments 395,699 16,001 24,411 389,095 20,506 32,681
Other subsidies and payments 0 137 220 3,491 186 266
Total gross budgetary expenditures 1,066,061 182,797 339,986 951,589 178,081 343,289
Less revenues netted against expenditures
Revenues
(290,000) (111,450) (112,214) (215,000) (33,300) (33,380)
Total revenues netted against expenditures (290,000) (111,450) (112,214) (215,000) (33,300) (33,380)
TOTAL NET BUDGETARY EXPENDITURES 776,061 71,347 227,772 736,589 144,781 309,909