Summary of program features

Family dispute resolution services and programs in Canada vary in several ways. The next sections summarize the key commonalities and differences among these programs. A comparison table that provides a high-level summary of key elements is provided in Appendix A. A supplementary document that provides more detailed information for each program or service that was collected through the interview process is available on request (rsd.drs@justice.gc.ca).

Note that varying levels of detail were provided during the interview process; this report presents results of the key commonalities and differences between services but has not attempted to document all detailed differences that may exist.

Program scope

A key aspect that impacts the access to justice provided by dispute resolution programs is their scope: who is eligible for service, the legal issues covered, and their geographic coverage.

Client eligibility

Issues covered

Geographic coverage

Nearly all programs offer services province- or territory-wide. Exceptions are:

Service delivery models

The service delivery models of the programs vary in the range of services provided, who provides services to parties, and the limits (usually the number of hours) to the service provided. Other aspects include the language and modes of service available, and whether user fees are in place.

Services provided, who provides the service, limits to the service

Language and modes of service

User fees

Most programs and services do not charge user fees. Exceptions are:

Connection to the court process

Many publicly-funded out-of-court dispute resolution programs provide service to parents who are not engaged in a court action (“voluntary” participation), though some do limit eligibility for service to those who are court-involved (see client eligibility above). In addition, some jurisdictions require participation in dispute resolution as a condition for accessing the court process; these requirements are usually set out in court rules or statutes. Often, both voluntary services and court mandated services are provided by the same program. Jurisdictions that require dispute resolution prior to or during the court process include:

While not required, participation in dispute resolution is strongly encouraged by Newfoundland and Labrador’s courts where there is the expectation that parties will attempt mediation where safe to do so. In Prince Edward Island, judges may order self-represented parties to work with the Child Support Services Office, but participation is not otherwise mandatory.