JustResearch Edition no. 13

Table 3: Most Serious Sentence in Cases of Child Sexual Exploitation (2002/2003)

Child Sexual Abuse
Custody Conditional Sentence Probation Other
N (row%) % Ind N (row%) % Ind N (row%) % Ind N (row%) % Ind
Sexual interference - s. 151 330 (49.7%) 73% 137 (20.6%) 68% 184 (27.7%) 49% 13 ( 2.0%) 46%
Invitation to sexual touching – s. 152 65 (57.5%) 63% 15 (13.3%) 67% 33 (29.2%) 31% 0 ( 0.0%) 0%
Sexual exploitation - s.153 50 (45.9%) 68% 27 (24.8%) 44% 30 (27.5%) 43% 2 ( 1.8%) 50%
Incest - s.155 14 (87.5%) - 1 ( 6.3%) - 1 ( 6.3%) - 0 ( 0.0%) -
Anal intercourse – s.159 2 (66.7%) 50% 0 ( 0.0%) 0% 1 (33.3%) 100% 0 ( 0.0%) 0%
Bestiality with person under 14 - s.160(3) 0 ( 0.0%) 0% 0 ( 0.0%) 0% 0 ( 0.0%) 0% 0 ( 0.0%) 0%
Exposure to person under 14 – s.173(2) 6 (19.4%) - 3 ( 9.7%) - 21 (67.7%) - 1 ( 3.2%) -
Permitting sexual activity under 18 - s.171 0 ( 0.0%) - 0 ( 0.0%) - 0 ( 0.0%) - 1 (100.0%) -

Child Prostitution
Custody Conditional Sentence Probation Other
N (row%) % Ind N (row%) % Ind N (row%) % Ind N (row%) % Ind
Living off the avails - s.212(2) & (2.1) 1 (50.0%) - 0 (0.0%) - 1 ( 50.0%) - 0 (0.0%) -
Communicates for the purpose - s.212(4) 6 (42.9%) - 0 (0.0%) - 8 ( 57.1%) - 0 (0.0%) -
Parent procuring sexual activity - s.170 0 ( 0.0%) - 0 (0.0%) - 0 (0.0%) - 0 (0.0%) -

Child Pornography
Custody Conditional Sentence Probation Other
N (row%) % Ind N (row%) % Ind N (row%) % Ind N (row%) % Ind
Production/possess for purposes - s.163.1(2) 2 (25.0%) 100% 1 (12.5%) 100% 3 (37.5%) 100% 2 (25.0%) 0%
Distribution/transmission - s.163.1(3) 3 (21.4%) 100% 6 (42.9%) 100% 5 (35.7%) 0% 0 ( 0.0%) 0%
Possession/accessing - s.163.1(4) & (4.1) 35 (31.3%) 61% 42 (37.5%) 79% 30 (26.8%) 47% 5 ( 4.5%) 0%
Total 514 (47.2%) 72% 234 (21.5%) 68% 317 (29.1%) 44% 23 (2.2%) 33%
  1. Since accessing child pornography (s. 163.1(4.1)) came into force July 23, 2002, it is unlikely that any of the possession/accessing cases were accessing only.
  2. The 'Other' category includes all other sentences such as fines, conditional discharges, restitution, or suspended sentences.
  3. The row total does not always add up to the total number of convictions from Table 2, as some sentences were unknown.
  4. Percentage indictable (% Ind) is provided only for hybrid offences and is an estimate since the Crown election was unknown in a small number of cases.
  5. Percentages do not always total 100% due to rounding error.
  6. Source: Adult Criminal Court Survey, Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, Statistics Canada.