References

  1. Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters. 2013. “Access to Civil and Family Justice. A Roadmap for Change.” Available at: https://www.cfcj-fcjc.org/sites/default/files/docs/2013/AC_Report_English_Final.pdf7
  2. Bell, F. 2019. “Family Law, Access to Justice, And Automation.” Macquarie-Law-Journal, 19, 103-132. Available at: https://www.mq.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/866290/Family-Law-Access-to-Justice-and-Automation.pdf
  3. Cashman, P. and E. Ginnivan. 2019. “Digital Justice: Online Resolution of Minor Civil Disputes and the Use of Digital Technology in Complex Litigation and Class Actions.” Macquarie Law Journal, 19, 39-79. Available at: https://www.mq.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/866289/Digital-Justice.pdf
  4. Department of Justice Canada. 2021. “National Justice Survey, 2021.” Available at: https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/porr/Pages/porr.aspx8
  5. Greacen, J. 2019. “Eighteen Ways Courts Should Use Technology to Better Serve Their Customers.” Family Court Review, 57(4), 515-538. Available at: https://iaals.du.edu/sites/default/files/documents/publications/eighteen_ways_courts_should_use_technology.pdf
  6. Hodson, D. 2019. “The Role, Benefits, and Concerns of Digital Technology in the Family Justice System.” International Family Law Group. Available at:  https://www.iflg.uk.com/printpdf/989
  7. MacLennan, S. 2016. “Empowerment, Technology, and Family Law.” eAccess to Justice.  197-209. University of Ottawa Press. Available at:  https://ruor.uottawa.ca/bitstream/10393/35566/1/9780776624303_eAccess.pdf
  8. Prescott, J.J. 2017. “Improving Access to Justice in State Courts with Platform Technology.” Vanderbilt Law Review, 70, 1993-2050. Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2912&context=articles
  9. R. A. Malatest and Associates Ltd. 2019. “My Law BC Evaluation.” Prepared for British Columbia Legal Services Society. Available at: https://legalaid.bc.ca/sites/default/files/2019-06/MyLawBCevaluationReport2019_0.pdf
  10. Salyzyn, A. 2012. “A New Lens: Reframing the Conversation about the Use of Video Conferencing in Civil Trials in Ontario.” Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 50(2), 429-463. Available at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1026&context=ohlj
  11. Schellhammer, E.P. 2013. “A Technology Opportunity for Court Modernization: Remote Appearances.” Prepared for Association of Canadian Court Administrators & Canadian Centre for Court Technology. Available at: https://silo.tips/download/a-technology-opportunity-for-court-modernization-remote-appearances
  12. Sourdin, T. B. Li, and T. Burke. 2019. “Just, Quick and Cheap: Civil Dispute Resolution and Technology.” Macquarie Law Journal, 19, 17-38. Available at: https://www.mq.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/866294/Macquarie-Law-Journal-Vol-19.pdf
  13. Tait, C. 2013. “Evaluation of the Distance Family Mediation Project: Report on Phase lll of the Technology-Assisted Family Mediation Project.” Prepared for Mediate BC Society. Available at: https://www.mediatebc.com/sites/default/files/Distance-Family-Mediation-Evaluation-Report-FINAL.pdf 
  14. Tait, C. 2016. “Evaluation of Online Parenting After Separation.” Prepared for Ministry of Justice: Family Justice Service Division. Available at: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/law-crime-and-justice/about-bc-justice-system/justice-services-branch/fjsd/opas-report-phase2.pdf
  15. Toohey, L., M. Moore, K. Dart and D. Toohey. 2019. “Meeting the Access to Civil Justice Challenge: Digital Inclusion, Algorithmic Justice, and Human-Centred Design.” Macquarie Law Journal, 19, 133-156.  Available at: https://www.mq.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/866294/Macquarie-Law-Journal-Vol-19.pdf
  16. Wolf, J.M. 2012. “Collaborative technology improves Access to Justice.” New York Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 3, 759-790. Available at: https://www.nyujlpp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Wolf-Collaborative-Technology.pdf

Footnotes

7 This study was not included in the annotated bibliography, as it did not specifically examine the use of technology in family courts and/or family justice services.

8 This study was not included in the annotated bibliography, as it did not specifically examine the use of technology in family courts and/or family justice services.