The Changing Face of Conditional Sentencing
8. An Empirical Analysis of Conditional Sentencing in British Columbia (continued)
| Location | #Breaches | % ** | Type of Breach | Total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mandatory | Optional | New Off. | Multiple* | U/K | |||||||||
| Vancouver | 189 #cs = 466 | 40.6% | 45 | 23.7% | 66 | 34.7% | 12 | 6.3% | 61 | 32.1% | 5 | 2.6% | 189 |
| Burnaby | 28 #cs = 81 | 34.6% | 8 | 28.6% | 6 | 21.4% | 3 | 10.7% | 10 | 35.7% | 1 | 3.6% | 28 |
| Port Coq. | 14 #cs = 67 | 20.9% | 2 | 14.3% | 8 | 57.1% | 3 | 21.4% | 1 | 7.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 14 |
| Overall | 231 | 37.6% | 55 | 23.8% | 80 | 34.6% | 18 | 7.8% | 72 | 31.2% | 6 | 2.6% | 231 |
*'Multiple' refers to allegation reports which alleged more than one ‘type’ of breach (i.e. non-reporting and new offence)
- Date modified: