Bill C-30: An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on April 19, 2021 and other measures
Questions and Answers (Division 26)
2021-005792
Qs & As
Bill C-30 (Budget Implementation Act 2021)
Judicial Pension Accrual
- Q 1 Why is the Government proposing this change?
- Q 2 What happens to a judge’s pensionable service if a recommendation for removal is ultimately rejected and the judge remains in office?
- Q 3 Why is this change not being made applicable to recommendations for removal made before it comes into force?
- Q 4 Why are these pension accrual provisions in BIA? Should they not be in a bill to reform the judicial conduct process, also announced in Budget 2021?
Q1 Why is the Government proposing this change?
- When the Canadian Judicial Council recommends a judge’s removal to the Minister of Justice, the judge has a right to challenge the recommendation in the courts. During the time it takes for a court to hear and rule on such a challenge, a judge continues accruing pensionable service.
- This may give rise to the perception that the judge has launched the challenge to accrue additional pensionable service. This in turn runs a risk of undermining public confidence in the judiciary.
- The proposed amendment would address these concerns in a way that respects judicial independence and is fair to the judge concerned.
Q2 What happens to a judge’s pensionable service if a recommendation for removal is ultimately rejected and the judge remains in office?
- The amendment ensures that if a recommendation for removal is rejected, pensionable service will resume accruing as if it had never been interrupted.
Q3 Why is this change not being made applicable to recommendations for removal made before it comes into force?
- Before changes to judicial compensation or benefits can be made, they must be considered by the Judicial Compensation and Benefits Commission.
- The Commission endorsed these changes in a report dated October 28, 2019, but it raised concerns suggesting that retroactive application would be unfair. In its response to the Commission’s report, dated February 28, 2020, the Government agreed to respect the Commission’s fairness concerns.
- There is currently no recommendation for removal before me.
Q4 Why are these pension accrual provisions in BIA? Should they not be in a bill to reform the judicial conduct process, also announced in Budget 2021?
- Including these pension accrual provisions in the BIA helps ensure their implementation at the earliest opportunity, which is important for two reasons.
- First, it will help ensure that the cases of judges currently subject to conduct proceedings are captured by the provisions. There is currently one judicial conduct inquiry, which is expected to produce a recommendation on the judge’s removal in late fall at the earliest.
- Second, these provisions were the subject of recommendations made by the Judicial Compensation and Benefits Commission in October 2019 and formally accepted by the Government in February 2020. The Judges Act requires the Minister of Justice to see to it that Commission recommendations accepted by the Government are implemented within a reasonable time.
- Reform of the judicial conduct process will be the subject of a separate bill, which will be introduced in the near future.
- Date modified: