Programme de financement des tribunaux de traitement de la toxicomanie, Évaluation formative

• Page précédente
• Table des matières
• Page suivante

6. Bibliographie

• Addiction and Mental Health Research Laboratory. (2006, June). EDTCRC Monitoring and Evaluation Framework. Edmonton: University of Alberta.

• Aos, S., Miller, M., & Drake, E. (2006). Evidence-Based Public Policy Options to Reduce Future Prison Construction, Criminal Justice Costs, and Crime Rates. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.

• Bourgon, G., & Price, S. (2007, September). Evaluation of the Drug Treatment Court of Ottawa: Year One: February 2006 to February 2007.

• D'Angelo, L., & Wolf, R.V.(2002). Management Note: Women and Addiction: Challenges for Drug Court Practitioners. Justice System Journal. Extrait le 31 mars 2009.

• Fomby, T. B., & Rangaprasad, V. (2002). Divert Court of Dallas County: cost-benefit analysis. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University. Extrait le 13 mars 2009.

• Forum aux questions sur les tribunaux de traitement de la toxicomanie - Centre canadien de lutte contre l'alcoolisme et les toxicomanies, (2007). Ottawa : CCLAT.

• Gliksman, L., Newton-Taylor, B., Patra, J., & Rehm, J. (2004). Toronto drug treatment court evaluation project final report. London, ON: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Social, Prevention and Health Policy Research Department.

• Gorkoff, K., Weinrath, M., & Appel, J. (2007, August). Winnipeg Drug Treatment Court Interim Evaluation. Gottfredson, D.C., Najaka, S.S., & Kearley, B. (2003). Effectiveness of Drug Treatment Courts: Evidence From a Randomized Trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(2), 171-196.

• Groupe informel d'experts sur les tribunaux de traitement et de la toxicomanie. Rapport de 1999. Vienne : Office des Nations Unies contre la drogue et le crime.

• Heck, Cary (2006, June). Local Drug Court Research: Navigating Performance Measures and Process Evaluations. Extrait le 29 mars 2009.

• Hora, P. et al. (1999). Therapeutic Jurisprudence and the Drug Treatment Court Movement: Revolutionizing the Criminal Justice System's Response to Drug Abuse and Crime in America. 74 Notre Dame Law Review 439. Extrait le 13 août 2008.

• Institute of Applied Research. (2004). A cost-benefit analysis of the St. Louis City adult felony drug court. St. Louis, Missouri. Extrait le 13 mars 2009.

• James, D., & Sawka, E. (2000, November). Drug Treatment Courts: Substance Abuse Intervention Within the Justice System. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.

• Latimer, J., Morton-Bourgon, K., & Chretien, J. (2006). Les tribunaux de traitement de la toxicomanie : méta-analyse. Ont-ils un effet positif sur les taux de récidive? Ottawa, ON : ministère de la Justice du Canada. Extrait le 13 mars 2009.

• Logan, T.K., Hoyt, W.H., McCollister, K.E., French, M.T., Leukefeld, C., & Minton, L. (2004). Economic Evaluation of Drug Court: Methodology, Results, and Policy Implications. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27, 381-396.

• Marchand, G., Waller, M., & Carey, S. M. (2006). Kalamazoo County adult drug treatment court outcome and cost evaluation. Portland, Oregon: Northwest Professional Consortium. Extrait le 13 mars 2009.

• Millson, W. A., Robinson, D., Stringer, A., & Van Dieten, M. (2005). Drug treatment court of Vancouver program evaluation: Final evaluation report. Ottawa, ON: Orbis Partners Inc.

• Ministère de la Justice du Canada. (16 juin 2006). Vue d'ensemble des exigences nationales en matière d'établissement de rapports d'évaluation et de rendement.

• Ministère de la Justice du Canada. (Mai 2008). Programme de financement des tribunaux de traitement de la toxicomanie : Cadre de gestion et de responsabilisation axé sur les résultats : Rapport final sur la Stratégie nationale antidrogue.

• Newton-Taylor, B., Naymark, M., & Coote, S. (2007, February). Toronto Drug Treatment Court: Evaluation Plan.

• Pernanen, K., Cousineau, M., Brochu, S., & Sun, F. (2001). Proportions of Crimes Associated with Alcohol and Other Drugs in Canada. Ottawa: Centre on Substance Abuse.

• Santé Canada. (Février 2004). Canada's Drug Strategy. An Update on Progress. Extrait le 25 mars 2009.

• Shaffer, D. K. (2006, October). Reconsidering Drug Court Effectiveness: A Meta-analytic Review [Executive Summary]. Las Vegas: University of Nevada, Department of Criminal Justice.

• Smithworks Surveysolutions. (2008, June). Regina Drug Treatment Court Implementation & Developmental Evaluation (ID-E) Report: Rising to the Challenges.

• Toronto Drug Treatment Court and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. (2005, January 17). Toronto Drug Treatment Court: Program Proposal.

• United States Government Accountability Office. (2005). Adult drug courts: evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results for other outcomes. Report to Congressional Committees, Washington, D.C. Extrait le 14 mars 2009.

• Werb, D., Kerr, T., Elliott, R., Fischer, B., Wood, E., Montaner, J, & Kerr, T. (2007). Drug treatment courts in Canada: an evidence-based review. HIV/AIDS Policy & Law Review, 12(2/3), 12-17.

• Wilsom, D.B., Mitchell, O., MacKenzie, D.L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 459-487.

• Page précédente
• Table des matières
• Page suivante