Exemptions from Mandatory Minimum Penalties - Recent Developments in Selected Countries

References

  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner (2002). Social Justice Report 2001 - Chapter 4: Laws mandating minimum terms of imprisonment (‘mandatory sentencing’) and Indigenous people. Sydney: HREOC. 
  • American Law Institute (2011). Model Penal Code Sentencing – Tentative Draft No. 2.  Philadelphia: ALI.
  • Anderson, E.W. (2015). “Not Ordinarily Relevant”: Bringing family responsibilities to the federal sentencing table. Boston College Law Review, 56(4), 1501-1536.
  • Australian Government (2011).  A Guide to Framing Commonwealth Offences, Infringement Notices and Enforcement Powers. Attorney General`s Department.
  • Australian Government (2012). Report of the Expert Panel on Asylum Seekers, Camberra, August 2012.
  • Bagaric, M. and Pathinayake, A. (2012). Mandatory harsh penalties for people smugglers in Australia: Time for reform. Journal of Criminal Law, 76(6), 493 – 511.
  • Cano, M. and C. Spohn (2012). Circumventing the Penalty for Offenders Facing Mandatory Minimums: Revisiting the Dynamics of “Sympathetic” and “Salvageable” Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39 (3): 308-332.
  • Cappellino, A. and Meringolo, J. (2014). The Federal Sentencing Guidelines and the Pursuit of Fair and Just Sentences. Albany Law Review, 77(3), 771-824.
  • Cassell, P.G. and Luna, E. (2011). Sense and Sensibility in Mandatory Minimum Sentencing. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 23(3), 219-227.
  • Chhana, R., Spier, P., Roberts, S., and C. Hurd (2004). The Sentencing Act 2002: Monitoring the First Year. Wellington: Ministry of Justice, March 2004.
  • Commonwealth of Australia (2012). Report of Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee.Migration Amendment (Removal of Mandatory Minimum Penalties) Bill 2012, Camberra, April 2012.
  • Dahl, A. (2014). Eric Holder’s recent curtailment of mandatory sentencing, its implications, and prospects for effective reform. BYU Journal of Public Law, 29(1), 271-297.
  • Dandurand, Y. (2014). Criminal Justice Reform and the System's Efficiency. Criminal Law Forum, 25(3), 383-440.
  • Department of Justice. (2013). Smart on Crime: Reforming the Criminal Justice System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
  • Director of Public Prosecutions (2014). Mandatory Minimum Penalties for Particular Drug Offences under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, Guideline of the Director Issued under Section 3(3)(c) of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act, March 1, 2014, Ottawa: Public Prosecution Service of Canada.
  • Director of Public Prosecutions (2014a). Mandatory Minimum Penalties under the Criminal Code, Guideline of the Director Issued under Section 3(3)(c) of the Director of Public Prosecutions Act, March 1, 2014, Ottawa: Public Prosecution Service of Canada.
  • Divita, C. (2015). “Cracking” the code: Interpreting sentence reduction requirements in favor of eligibility for crack cocaine offenders who avoided a mandatory minimum for their substantial assistance to authorities. Boston College Law Review, 56(3), 1143-1179.
  • Farrell, A. (2004). Measuring Judicial and Prosecutorial Discretion: Sex and race disparities in departures from the federal sentencing guidelines. Justice Research and Policy, 6 (1), 45-78.
  • Fiorillo, S.E. (2013). Mitigating after Miller: Legislative considerations and remedies for the future of juvenile sentencing. Boston University Law Review, 93(6), 2095-2129.
  • Fischman, J.B. and Schanzenbach, M.M. (2012). Racial Disparities Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: The role of judicial discretion and mandatory minimums. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9(4), 729-764.
  • Fitz-Gibbon, K. (2016). Minimum sentencing for murder in England and Wales: A critical examination 10 years after the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Punishment and Society, 18(1), 47-67.
  • Fritchie, H. H. (2015). State v. Noble: Mandatory minimum madness in Louisiana. Tulane Law Review, 89(4), 933-946.
  • Gazal-Ayal, O., Turjeman, H., and Fishman, G. (2013). Do Sentencing Guidelines Increase Prosecutorial Discretion? Law and Contemporary Problems, 76:131-159.
  • Hartley, R. (2008).”Sentencing Reforms and the War on Drugs: An analysis of sentence outcomes for narcotics offenders adjudicated in U.S. district courts on the southwest border”, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24 (4), 437-461.
  • Hartley, R., Maddan, S., and Spohn, C. (2007). Prosecutorial Discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases. Justice Quarterly, (24): 382-407.
  • Hartley, R. D. and Armendariz, L. F. (2011). “Border Justice? Sentencing Federal Narcotics Offenders in Southwest Border Districts: A focus on citizenship status”, Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 27(1): 43–62.
  • Hughes, G. (2001). The Mandatory Sentencing Debate. Melbourne: Law Council of Australia.
  • Jacobs F. and White R. (1996). The European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • James, N. (2014). The Federal Prison Population Buildup: Overview, policy changes, issues, and options. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
  • Johnson, B. D., Ulmer, J. T. and Kramer, J. H. (2008). The Social Context of Guidelines Circumvention: The case of Federal District Courts. Criminology, 46 (3):737-783.
  • Justice Policy Institute (2007). Maryland’s Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentencing Laws - Their Impact on Incarceration, State Resources and Communities of Color. Washington (D.C.): JPI.
  • Kautt, P. M. and Delone, M. A.  (2006). Sentencing Outcomes under Competing but Coexisting Sentencing Interventions: Untying the Gordian knot. Criminal Justice Review, 31(2): 105-131.
  • Kennedy, M. (2014). The End of Mandatory Juvenile Life Without Parole. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(5), 553-578.
  • Krasnostein, S. and Freiberg, A. (2013). Pursuing Consistency in an Individualistic Sentencing Framework: If you know where you’re going, how do you know when you’ve got there? Law and Contemporary Problems, 76(1), 265-288.
  • Lipscombe, S. and Beard, J. (2015). Mandatory Life Sentences for Murder. London: House of Commons Library.
  • Lynch, M. and Omori, M. (2014). Legal change and sentencing norms in the wake of Booker: The impact of time and place on drug trafficking cases in Federal Court. Law and Society Review, 48(2), 441-445.
  • Mallett, S.J. (2015). Judicial discretion in sentencing: A justice system that is no longer just? Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 46(2), 533-571
  • Martin, D. (2001). Distorting the Prosecution Process: Informers, mandatory minimum sentences, and wrongful convictions. Osgoode Hall Law Journal (39): 153-165.
  • Merritt, N., Fain, T., and Turner, S. (2006). Oregon’s Get Tough sentencing Reform: A lesson in justice system adaptation. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(1): 5-36.
  • Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission (2011). Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and Commentary, Revised August 1, 2011.  St.-Paul (MN): MSGC. 
  • Nagel, I. H. and Schulhofer, S. J. (1992). A Tale of Three Cities: An empirical study of charging and bargaining practices under the federal sentencing guidelines. Southern California Law Review, 66, 501-566.
  • O’Donovan, M. and J. Redpath (2006). The Impact of Mandatory Sentencing in South Africa. Report 2. Cape Town: Open Society Foundation.
  • Office of Legislative Research, Connecticut General Assembly (2015). Crime with Mandatory Minimum Prison Sentences – Updated and Revised. Hartford (CT), February 24, 2015.
  • O’Sullivan, M. (2006) “Gender and sentencing proceedings in South Africa”, in Sentencing in South Africa – Report 1.  Newlands (S.A.): Open Society Foundation for South Africa, pp. 59-65.
  • Ortiz, N.R. and Spohn, C. (2014). Mitigating the Effect of a Criminal Record at Sentencing: Local life circumstances and substantial assistance departures among recidivists in Federal Court. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 25(1), 3-28
  • Poletti, P. and Donelly, H. (2010). The Impact of the Standard Non-parole Period Sentencing Scheme on Sentencing Patterns in New South Wales. Sydney: Judicial Commission of New South Wales. 
  • Price, M. (2013). Mill(er)ing Mandatory Minimums: What federal lawmakers should take from Miller v. Alabama. Missouri Law Review, 78(3), 1147-1181.
  • Roberts, J.V. (2012). Structuring Sentencing in Canada, England and Wales: A tale of two jurisdictions. Criminal Law Forum, 23(1), 319-345.
  • Roberts, J.V. (2013). Sentencing Guidelines in England and Wales: Recent developments and emerging issues. Law and Contemporary Problems, 76(1), 1-26.
  • Roth, L. (2014). E-brief: Mandatory Sentencing Laws. Sydney, Australia: NSW Parliamentary Research Service
  • Sentencing Advisory Council (2011). Statutory Minimum Sentences for Gross Violence Offences Report. Melbourne (Victoria): Sentencing Advisory Council, October 2011.
  • Stith, K. (2013). Principles, Pragmatism and Politics: The Evolution of Washington State's Sentencing Guidelines. Law and Contemporary Problems, 76:105-219.
  • Rudman, D. (2006). “Sentencing Policy Developments in South Africa, 1994–2006”, in Sentencing in South Africa – Report 1.  Newlands (S.A.): Open Society Foundation for South Africa, pp. 26-39.
  • Sloth-Nielsen, J. and Ehlers, L. (2005). “Assessing the Impact – Mandatory and minimum sentences in South Africa”, SA Crime Quarterly, 14 (Dec.): 15-22.
  • Spohn, C. and Fornango, R. (2009). “U.S. Attorneys and Substantial Assistance Departures: Testing for interprosecutor disparity”, Criminology, 47 (3) 813-845.
  • Spohn, C. (2014). Twentieth-Century Sentencing Reform Movement - Looking Backward, Moving Forward, Criminology and Public Policy, 13(4): 535-545.
  • Stacey, A., and Spohn, C. (2006). Gender and the Social Costs of Sentencing: An analysis of sentences imposed on male and female offenders in three U.S. district courts. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law, 11, 43-76.
  • Stith, K. (2013). Principles, Pragmatism and Politics: The Evolution of Washington State's Sentencing Guidelines. Law and Contemporary Problems, 76:105-219.
  • Tonry, M. (2006). Criminology, Mandatory Minimums, and Public Policy. Criminology and Public Policy, 5(1): 45-66.
  • Tonry, M. (2009). The Mostly Unintended Effects of Mandatory Penalties: Two centuries of consistent findings. Crime and Justice, 38(1): 65-114.
  • Tonry, M.  (2014). Remodeling American Sentencing: A Ten-Step Blueprint for Moving Past Mass Incarceration. Criminology and Public Policy, 13(4): 503-532.
  • Trotter, A. and Garozzo, M. (2012). Mandatory sentencing for peoples smuggling: Issues of law and policy. Melbourne University Law Review, 36(2), 553-617.
  • Ulmer, J. T., Kurlychek, M. C., and Kramer, J. H. (2007). Prosecutorial Discretion and the Imposition of Mandatory Minimum Sentences. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44 (4): 427-458.
  • Ulmer, J. T., Eisenstein, J., and Johnson, B. D. (2010).  Trial Penalties in Federal Sentencing: Extra-guidelines factors and district variation. Justice Quarterly, 27(4): 560-592.
  • Uniform Law Conference of Canada, Criminal Section (2013). Statutory Exemptions to Mandatory Minimum Penalties: Final Report, Victoria, August 2013.
  • United States Attorney General (2013). Memorandum to the United States Attorneys and Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, “Department Policy on Charging Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Recidivist Enhancements in Certain Drug Cases”, August 12, 2013.
  • United States Attorney General (2013a). Memorandum to the United States Attorneys and Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, “Retroactive Application of Department Policy on Charging Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Recidivist Enhancements in Certain Drug Cases”, August 12, 2013.  
  • United States Department of Justice (2013). Smart on Crime: Reforming the Criminal Justice System for the 21st Century. Washington (D.C.): Department of Justice.
  • United States Sentencing Commission (2011). Report to Congress: Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System. Washington (D.C.): USSC.
  • United States Sentencing Commission (2011a). Compilation of Departure Provisions. Washington (D.C.): USSC, November 2011.
  • United States Sentencing Commission (2011b). 2011 Federal Sentencing Guidelines Manual. Washington (D.C.): USSC, November 2011.
  • Whyte, C, Yick, J, Vahlberg, D and Swart, L. (2015). Review of the Northern Territory Sentencing Amendment (Mandatory Minimum Sentences) Act 2013. Department of the Attorney General and Justice, Darwin.
Date modified: