Le droit de visite au Canada : Approche juridique et appui aux programmes

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

  • Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
    1998 Notice of Proposed rulemaking. Site Web: http://www.acf.dhhs.us

  • Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
    1998 State Child Access and Visitation Programs: a Preliminary Report

  • Alberta Justice
    1999 Edmonton Provincial Court Civil Mediation Project: Evaluation Report Strategic Planning and Operational Co-ordination, Court Services, Edmonton. Site Web: http://www.albertacourts.ab.ca

  • Amato, P., et S. Rezac
    1994 «Contact with Non-resident Parents, Interparental Conflict, and Children's Behaviour», Journal of Family Issues 15: 191-207

  • Arbuthnot, J., et D. Gordon
    1997 «Does Mandatory Divorce Education for Parents Work, a Six-Month Outcome Evaluation». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.34, no1, juillet.

  • Arbuthnot, J., K. Kramer et D. Gordon
    1996 «Patterns of Re-Litigation Following Divorce Education», Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.35, no3, juillet.

  • Arditti, J.
    1992 «Factors Related to Custody, Visitation, and Child Support for Divorced Fathers: An Exploratory Analysis». Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 17(3-4).

  • Australian Law Reform Commission
    2000 Managing Justice: A Review of the Federal Civil Justice System. Rapport no89. Commonwealth d'Australie.

  • Australian Law Reform Commission
    1997 Review of the Adversarial System of Litigation: Rethinking Family Law Proceedings. IP22, Commonwealth d'Australie.

  • Australian Law Reform Commission
    1996 Speaking for Ourselves: Children and the Legal Process. IP18, Commonwealth d'Australie.

  • Australian Law Reform Commission
    1995 For the Sake of the Kids: Complex Contact Cases and the Family Court. Rapport no73. Robert Burton Printers.

  • Australian Law Reform Commission
    1994 «Equality Before the Law: Justice for Women», partie1. Rapport no69. Commonwealth d'Australie.

  • Ayoub, C., R. Deutsch et A. Maraganore
    1999 «Emotional Distress in Children of High Conflict Divorce: The Impact of Marital Conflict and Distress». Family and Conciliation Courts Review,vol.37, no3, juillet.

  • Bailey, M.
    1988 «Unpacking the 'Rational Alternative': A Critical Review of Family Mediation Movement Claims». Canadian Journal of Family Law,8.

  • Bala, N., L. Bertrand, J. Paetsch, B. Knoppers, J. Hornick, J.-F. Noël, L. Boudreau et S. Miklas
    1998 La violence entre conjoints associée aux différends relatifs à la garde des enfants et au droit d'accès: recommandations visant une réforme.

  • Ottawa, Condition féminine Canada.
    Bassett, R.
    1998 Use of Dispute Resolution in Access Enforcement: Effectiveness, Description of Models, and Policy Issues. Ébauche du document de travail préparé pour le Comité fédéral-provincial-territorial sur le droit de la famille.

  • Birnbaum, R., et H. Radanovanovic
    1999 «Brief Intervention for Access-Based Post Separation Disputes: Family and Court Outcomes». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.37, no4, octobre.

  • Brown, C.
    1997a Family Mediation and Conciliation Counselling in the Family Court. Article présenté dans le cadre de l'International Conference on Mediation à Singapour. Site Web: http://www.familycourt.gov.au/papers

  • Brown, C.
    1997b Diversity in primary dispute resolution services: What are the choices for clients? Tribunal de la famille de l'Australie. Site Web: http://www.familycourt.gov.au/papers

  • Brown, C.
    1997c Integration of Dispute Resolution Services Within Family Courts. Article présenté dans le cadre du Word Congress on Family Law and the Rights of Children and Youth qui a eu lieu en juin 1997 à San Francisco. Site Web: http://www.familycourt.gov.au/papers

  • Brown, T.
    1998 «Focussing on the Child». Article présenté dans le cadre du Third National Family Court Conference qui a eu lieu à Melbourne, en Australie, en octobre 1998. Site Web: http://www.familycourt.gov.au/papers/fca3/Brown3.PDF

  • California Family Court Service Snapshot Study
    1997 «The Impact of Case Characteristics andMediation Service Models». Rapport no3 (1991). Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.35, no3, juillet.

  • Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family et Policy Research Centre on Children, Youth and Families
    1992 Child Custody and Access: A Consultation Report. Ministère de la Justice, 1992.

  • Colombie-Britannique
    1999 Mandatory Parenting After Separation Pilot: First Evaluation Report. Ministry of Attorney General, Management Information and Evaluation Division, Victoria.

  • Colombie-Britannique
    1992 The Family Advocate Program: A Review of Current Operations and Proposals for Future Development. Ministry of Attorney General, Victoria.

  • Davies, B., S. Ralph, M. Hawton et L. Craig
    1995 «A Study of Client Satisfaction with Family Court Counselling in Cases Involving Domestic Violence». Family Conciliation and Courts Review, vol.33, no3, juillet.

  • Depner, C., K. Cannata et I. Ricci
    1995 «Report 4: Mediated Agreements on Child Custody and Visitation: The 1991 California Family Court Services Snapshot Study». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.33, no1, janvier.

  • Depner, C., K. Cannata et M. Simon
    1992 «Building a Uniform Statistical Reporting System: A Snapshot of California Family Services». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.30, no2, avril.

  • Duryee, M.
    1992 «Mandatory Court Mediation: Demographic Summary and Consumer Evaluation of One Court Service». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.30, no2, avril.

  • Family Law Council
    1998a Child Contact Orders: Enforcement and Penalties. Juin 1998. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Site Web: http://law.anu.edu.au/

  • Family Law Council
    1998b Interim Report: Penalties and Enforcement. Mars 1998. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Site Web: http://law.anu.edu.au/

  • Family Law Council
    1998c Annual Report 1997-98. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. http://law.anu.edu.au/

  • Family Law Council
    1995 Annual Report 1994-95. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Site Web: http://law.anu.edu.au/

  • Family Law Council
    1992a Patterns of Parenting after Separation. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Site Web: http://law.anu.edu.au/

  • Family Law Council
    1992b Family Mediation. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Site Web: http://law.anu.edu.au/

  • Family Law Council
    1989 The Registration of Parenting Plans. Lettre d'avis à l'intention du procureur général du gouvernement de l'Australie. Site Web: http://law.anu.edu.au/

  • Ferrier, J.
    1996a «What's Next for Friend of the Court?» Michigan Family Law Journal, vol.23, no12, décembre.

  • Ferrier, J.
    1996b «Friend of the Court Reform, Proposed and Imposed, Or, What Hath Geake Wrought». Michigan Family Law Journal, vol.23, no10, octobre.

  • Friend of the Court Act Mandatory Services MCL 552.501
    s. d. Site Web: http://courts.michigan.gov/scao/services/focb/focb_over.htm

  • Friend of the Court Miscellaneous Discretionary Services
     s. d. Site Web: http://courts.michigan.gov/scao/services/focb/focb_over.htm

  • Friend of the Court Overview
     1998 Site Web: http://courts.michigan.gov/scao/services/focb/focb_over.htm

  • Funder, K.
    1996 «Complex Cases and the Family Court». Family Matters, Journal of the Australian Institute of Family Studies. Site Web: http://www.aifs.org.au

  • Funder, K., et B. Smyth
    1996 Evaluation of the Impact of Part VII of the Family Law Reform Act 1995: Public Attitudes to Parental Responsibilities and Children's Rights after Parental Separation. Canberra:Australian Institute of Family Studies, AGPS.

  • Gibson, J., M. Harrison et C. Brown
    1996 Client Attitudes to the Counselling Service of the Family Court of Australia. Rapport no15. Melbourne: Family Court of Australia Publications Unit.

  • Gray, C., M. Verdieck, E. Smith et K. Freed
    1997 «Making it Work: An Evaluation of Court-Mandated Parenting Workshops for Divorcing Families». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.35, no3, juillet.

  • Harrison, M.
    1997 «Resolution of Disputes in Family Law: Should the Courts be Confined to Litigation?» Family Matters, Journal of the Australian Institute for Family Studies. Site Web: http://www.aifs.org.au

  • Hirst, S.R., et G.W. Smiley
    1984 «The Access Dilemma: A Study of Access Patterns Following Marriage Breakdown». Conciliation Courts Review, vol.22, juin1984.

  • Jenkins, J., N. Park et M. Peterson-Badali
    1997 «An Evaluation of Supervised Access II: Perspectives of Parents and Children». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.35, no1, janvier.

  • Johnston, J., et L. Campbell
    1993 «Parent Child Relationships in domestic violence families disputing custody». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 31(3): 282-298.

  • Johnston, J.
    1995 «Domestic violence and parent-child relationships in families disputing custody». Australian Journal of Family Law, 9.

  • Johnston, J., et R. Strauss
    1999 «Traumatized Children in Supervised Visitation: What do they need?» Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.37, no2, avril 1999.

  • Kelly, J.
    1993 «Current Research on Children's Post-Divorce Adjustment: No Simple Answers». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.31, no1, janvier1993.

  • Kelly, J., et M. Lamb
    (sous presse) «Using Child Development Research to Make Appropriate Custody and Access Decisions for Young Children». Family and Conciliation Courts Review.

  • King, V.
    1994 «Nonresident Father Involvement and Child Well-Being: Can Dads make a difference?» Journal of Family Issues, 15.

  • Kruk, E.
    1993 Divorce and Disengagement. Halifax: Fernwood.

  • Lamb, M., K. Sternberg et R. Thompson
    1997 «The Effects of Divorce and Custody Arrangements on Children's Behaviour, Development and Adjustment». Family and Conciliation Courts Review,vol.35, no4, octobre 1997.

  • Lee, C., J. Shaughnessey et J. Bankes
    1995 «Impact of Expedited Visitation Services, a Court Program that Enforces Access, Through the Eyes of Children». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.33, no4, octobre1995.

  • Lehner, L.
    1992 «Mediation Parent Education Programs in the California Family Courts».Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.30, no2, avril.

  • Lye, D.
    1999 Washington State Parenting Plan Study. Washington State Supreme Court Gender and Justice Commission and the Domestic Relations Commission. Site Web: http://www.courts.wa.gov/

  • MacKenzie, B.
    1999 Interim Progress Report: Comprehensive Co-Mediation and Mediation Internship Pilot Project. Winnipeg (Manitoba).

  • Marcil-Gratton, N., et C. Le Bourdais
    1999 Garde des enfants, droits de visite et pension alimentaire: Résultats tirés de l'Enquête longitudinale nationale sur les enfants et les jeunes. Ministère de la Justice du Canada, CSR-1999-3F.

  • McCall, M.
    1995 Literature Review of Access Research. Ministère de la Justice. Rapport technique TR-1996-9E. Citations additionnelles.

  • McDonald, M.
    1990 Children's perceptions of access and their adjustment in the post-separation period. Family Court of Australia, no9.

  • McLeod, J.
    1989 «Enforcement of Access and Ontario Bill 124». Canadian Family Law Quarterly 4.

  • Ministère de la Justice
    1997 Statistiques choisies sur les familles canadiennes et le droit de la famille. Rapport de recherche, CSR-1997-5E.

  • Model Friend of the Court Handbook
     1998 Lansing (Michigan), août 1998. Site Web: http://courts.michigan.gov/scao/services/focb/focb_over.htm

  • Murray, K.
    1999 «When Children Refuse to Visit Parents: Is Prison an Appropriate Remedy?» Family and Conciliation Courts Review,vol.37, no1, janvier 1999.

  • Newmark, L., A. Harrell et P. Salem
    1995 «Domestic Violence and Empowerment in custody and visitation cases». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.33.

  • Nicholson, A.
    1994 «Mediation in the Family Court in Australia». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.32, no2, avril1994.

  • Nicholson, A.
    1999a Court Management of Cases Involving Child Abuse Allegations. Keynote Address to 7th Australasian Conference on Child Abuse and Neglect, octobre. Site Web: http://www.familycourt.gov.au/papers

  • Nicholson, A.
    1999b Issues Facing the Court and Future Directions: Opening Keynote Address. Address to the Queensland Family Law Practitioners Association Residential Conference, juillet. Site Web: http://www.familycourt.gov.au/papers

  • Nord, C.W., et N. Zill
    1996 Non-Custodial Parents' Participation in Their Children's Lives: Evidence from the Survey of Income and Program Participation, Volume II. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Site Web: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov.us

  • Park, W., M. Peterson-Badali et J. Jenkins
    1997 «An Evaluation of Supervised Access 1: Organizational Issues». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.35, no1, janvier.

  • Parlement de l'Australie
    2000 Family Law Amendment Bill 2000 Site Web: http://www.ag.gov.au

  • Pappas, D.
    1993 «Direction or Conciliation: The Theory and Reality of Preliminary Directions Hearings Conducted in Croydon, England, under the Children Act 1989». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.31, no3, juillet1993.

  • Pearson, J., et J. Anhalt
    1994 «Enforcing Visitation Rights (Innovative Programs in five States' Courts). Judges Journal, printemps1994.

  • Peterson-Badali, M., J. Maresca, N. Park et J. Jenkins
    1997 «An Evaluation of Supervised Access III: Perspectives from the Legal System». Family and Conciliation Courts Review,vol.35, no1, janvier.

  • Prairie Research Associates
    1993 Access Assistance Program Evaluation Report. Préparé pour le ministère des Services à la famille et pour le ministère de la Justice du Manitoba, Winnipeg.

  • Rhoades, H., G. Graycar et M. Harrison
    1999 The Family Law Reform Act 1995: Can changing legislation change legal culture, legal practice and community expectations? Rapport provisoire, avril 1999.

  • Ricci, I.
    1992 «Implementing a Legislative Mandate for Services and Coordination to California's Court Connected Family Mediation and Conciliation Courts». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.30, no2, avril.

  • Strategic Partners Pty. Ltd.
    1998 Contact Services in Australia: Research and Evaluation Report, annexe3. Legal Aid and Family Services Attorney General's Department, gouvernement de l'Australie.http://www.ag.gov.au

  • Strauss, R., et E. Alda
    1994 «Supervised Child Access: The Evolution of a Social Service». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.32, (2) 230.

  • Strauss, R.
    1995 «Supervised Visitation and Family Violence». Family Law Quarterly, 29:229-253.

  • Support and Parenting Time Enforcement Act Mandatory Services MCL 552.601 à 552.650 s. d. Lansing (Michigan). Site Web: http://courts.michigan.gov/scao/services/focb/focb_over.htm

  • Thoennes, N., et J. Pearson
    1999 «Supervised Visitation: Profile of Providers». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.37, no4, octobre.

  • Thoennes, N., P. Salem et J. Pearson
    1995 «Mediation and Domestic Violence: Current Policies and Practice». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.35, no1, janvier.

  • Tompkins, R.
    1995 «Parenting Plans: A Concept Whose Time Has Come». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.33, no3, juillet.

  • Transition House Association of Nova Scotia (TRANS)
    2000 Abused Women in Family Mediation: A Nova Scotia Snapshot.

  • Wallerstein, J., et J. Kelly
    1980 Surviving the Break-up: How children and parents cope with divorce. New York: Basic Books.

  • Wallerstein, J., et J. Lewis
    1998 «The Long-term Impact of Divorce on Children: A first Report from a 25-Year Study». Family and Conciliation Courts Review, vol.36, no3, juillet.

  • Weir, R.
    1985 Access patterns and conflicts: A study of access patterns between three groups of separated families differing in their level of post-separation conflict. Family Court of Australia, no7.