Interaction entre les capacités de développement des enfants et l'environnement d'une salle d'audience : Incidences sur la compétence à témoigner

• Page précédente
• Table des matières
• Page suivante

BIBLIOGRAPHIE

• Source inconnue. 1994, 2001.
• ASTINGTON, J.W. « Children's understanding of the speech act of promising », Journal of Child Language, no 15 (1988), p. 157-173.
• BAKER-WARD, L.E., B.N. GORDON, P.A. ORNSTEIN, D.M. LARUS, et P.A. CLUBB. « Young children's long term retention of a pediatric examination », Child development, no 64 (1993), p. 1519-1533.
• BALA, N. Child sexual abuse prosecutions: Children in the courts, Document présenté dans le cadre d'un séminaire tenu en juillet 1993 par le Conseil canadien de la magistrature, à Alymer (Québec).
• BALA, N., K. LEE, R. LINDSAY, et V. TALWAR. « A legal and psychological critique of the present approach to the assessment of the competence of the child witness », Osgoode Hall Law Journal, no 38 (2001), p. 409-451.
• BALA, N., R.C.L. LINDSAY, et E. MCNAMARA. « Testimonial aids for children: The Canadian experience with closed circuit tv, screens, and videotapes ». Criminal Law Quarterly, no 44 (2001), p. 461-489.
• BERLINER, L., et M. BARBIERI. « The testimony of the child victim of sexual abuse », Journal of Social Issues, no 40 (1984), p. 125-137.
• BLISHEN, J., et P. GUMMER. Proposed Guidelines for Responding to multi-victim multiperpetrator child sexual cases, Child Abuse Project, Prescott (Ontario), s. d.
• BRAINERD, C.J., et P.A. ORNSTEIN. « Children's memory for witnessed events », dans J. Doris, éd., The suggestibility of children's memory, Washington (DC), American Psychological Press, 1991, p. 10-20.
• BRUCK, M., H. HEMBROOKE, et S.J. CECI. « Children's reports of pleasant and unpleasant events », dans D. Read, et S. Lindsay, éd., Recollections of trauma: Scientific evidence and clinical practice, New York, Plenum Press, 1997, p. 199-213.
• CARTER, C.A., B.L. BOTTOMS, et M. LEVINE. « Linguistic, social and emotional influences on the accuracy of children's reports », Law and Human Behavior, no 20 (1996), p. 335- 358.
• CASHMORE, J., et K. BUSSEY. « Children's conceptions of the witness rôle », dans J. Spencer, G., Nicholson, R. Flin, et R. Bull , éd., Children's evidence in legal proceedings: An international perspective, Cambridge, Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge (Angleterre), 1990, p. 177-188.
• CECI, S.J., et M. BRUCK. « The suggestibility of the child witness: A historical perspective ». Psychological Bulletin, no 113 (1993), p. 403-439.
• CECI, S.J., et M. BRUCK. L'enfant-témoin : une analyse scientifique des témoignages d'enfants, Bruxelles, Université De Boeck, 1998.
• CECI, S.J., M.P. TOGLIA, et D.F. ROSS. « On remembering... more or less: A trace strength interpretation of developmental differences in suggestibility », Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, no 117 (1988), p. 201-203.
• CLUBB, P.A., R. NIDA, K. MERRITT, et P.A. ORNSTEIN. « Visiting the doctor. Children's knowledge and memory », Cognitive Development, no 8 (1993), p. 361-372.
• Comité permanent de la Justice et du Solliciteur général. Examen de quatre ans des dispositions du Code criminel et de la Loi sur la preuve au Canada sur l'exploitation sexuelle des enfants (anciennement Projet de loi C-15), procès-verbaux et témoignages du Comité permanent de la Justice et du Solliciteur général, 0839-2366; 34-3, n° 101, 1993.
• Comité sur les infractions sexuelles à l'égard des enfants et des jeunes, volumes I et II. Ministre des Approvisionnements et Services Canada, Ottawa, 1984.
• COULBORN-FALLER, K. Evaluating children suspected of having been sexually abused, APSAC Study Guides 2, Thousand Oaks (CA), Sage Publications, 1996.
• DAVIES, G.M. « Children on trial? Psychology, video-technology and the law », The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, no 30 (1991), p. 177-191.
• DELOACHE, J.S. « Young children's understanding of models », dans R. Fivush et J.A. Hudson, éd., Knowing and remembering in young children, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1990, p. 94-126.
• DENT, R., et R. FLIN. Children as witnesses, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
• EISEN, M.L., G.S. GOODMAN, J. QIN, et S.L. DAVIS. « Memory and suggestibility in maltreated children. New research relevant to evaluating allegations of abuse », dans S. Lynn, éd., Truth in memory development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, no 67 (1998), p. 389-408.
• ELTRINGHAM, S. Communication personnelle, 20 mars 1999.
• FARRAR, M.J., et G.S. GOODMAN. « Developmental changes in event memory », Child Development, no 55 (1992), p. 1697-1709.
• FISCHER, K.W. « A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchical skills », Psychological Review, no 87 (1980), p. 477-531.
• FIVUSH, R. « Developmental perspectives on autobiographical recall », dans G.S. Gordon, et B. Bottoms, éd., Child victims, child witnesses: Understanding and improving testimony, New York, Guilford Press, 1993, p. 1-24.
• FIVUSH, R., et J. HUDSON, éd. Knowing and remembering in young children, New York, Cambridge University Press, 1990.
• FIVUSH, R., J. HUDSON, et K. NELSON. « Children's long term memory for a novel event. An exploratory study », Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, no 30 (1984), p. 303- 316.
• FLAVELL, J.H., J.R. SPEER, F.L. GREEN, et D.L. AUGUST. « The development of comprehension monitoring and knowledge about communication », Monographie publiée par la Society for Research in Child Development no 46 (1981), p. 43-48.
• FLIN, R., Y. STEVENSON, et G. DAVIES. « Children's knowledge of court proceedings », British Journal of Psychology, no 80 (1989), p. 285-297.
• FOA, E.B., et D.S. RIGGS. « Post traumatic stress disorder in rape victims », dans J. Oldham, M. Riba, et A.Tasman, éd., American Psychiatric Press Review of Psychiatry, Washington (DC), American Psychiatric Press, no 12 (1993), p. 273-303.
• FRESHWATER, K., et J. ALDRIDGE. « Knowledge and fears of court », Child Abuse Review, no 3 (1994), p. 183-199.
• GOODMAN, G.S. « Children's testimony in historical perspective », Journal of Social Issues, no 40 (1984), p. 2-32.
• GOODMAN G.S., B.L. BOTTOMS, B. SCHWARTZ-KENNY, et L. RUDY. « Children's testimony as a stressful event. Improving children's reports », Journal of Narrative and Life History, no 1 (1991), p. 69-99.
• GOODMAN, G.S., D.H. HEPPS, et R.S. REED. « The child victim's testimony », dans A. Haralamic, éd., New Issues for child advocates, Arizona Council of Attorneys for Children, Phoenix (Arizona), 1986, p. 167-176.
• GOODMAN, G.S., A.D. REDLICH, J. QIN, S. GHETTI, K.S. TYDA, J.M. SCHAAF, et coll. « Evaluating eyewitness testimony in adults and children », dans A. K. Hess et J.B., éd., The handbook of forensic psychology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1998, p. 218-272.
• GOODMAN, G.S., L. RUDY, B.L. BOTTOMS, et C. AMAN. « Children's concerns and memory: Ecological issues in the study of children's eyewitness testimony », dans R. Fivush et J. Hudson, éd., Knowing and remembering in young children, New York, University Press, 1990, p 249-289.
• GOODMAN, G.S., E. TAUB, D. JONES, P. ENGLAND, L. PORT, L. RUDY, et coll. « Emotional effects of criminal court testimony on child sexual assault victims », Monographies de la Society for Research in Child Development, no 59 (1993), p. 286- 320.
• GOPNIK, A., et J.W. ASTINGTON. « Children's understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction », Child Development, no 59 (1998), p. 26-37.
• GOPNIK, A., et P. GRAF. « Knowing how you know », Child Development, no 59 (1988), p. 1366-1371.
• GREENHOOT, A.F., P.A. ORNSTEIN, B.N. GORDON, et L. BAKER-WARD. « Acting out the details of a pediatric check-up. The impact of interview condition and behavioral style on children's memory reports », Child Development, no 70 (1995), p. 363-380.
• GREENSTOCK, G., et M.E. PIPE. « Interviewing children about past events: The influence of peer support and misleading questions », Child Abuse and Neglect, no 20 (1996), p. 69- 80.
• HAFMEISTER, T. « Protecting child witnesses: Judicial efforts to minimize the trauma and reduce evidentiary barriers », Violence and Victims, no 11 (1996), p. 73-91.
• HAMBLEN, M., J. LIEBERGOTT, et M. LEVINE. « Legal implications and emotional consequences of sexually abused children testifying as victim witnesses », Law and Psychology Review, no 21 (1997), p. 139-179.
• HARRIS, M. Les ordres trahis : la tragédie de Mount Cashel, Montréal, Libre expression, 1991.
• HAUGAARD, J.J. « Young children's classification of the corroboration of a false statement as the truth or a lie », Law and Human Behavior, no 17 (1993), p. 645-659.
• HAUGAARD, J.J., N.D. REPUCCI, J. LAIRD, et T. NAUFUL. « Children's definitions of the truth and their competency to testify in legal proceedings », Law and Human Behavior, no 15 (1991), p. 253-271.
• HOWARD, A.N., H.L. OSBORNE, et L. BAKER-WARD. Childhood cancer, survivors' memory of their treatment after long delays, affiche présentée en avril 1997 à la réunion bienniale de la Society for Research in Child Development, Washington (DC).
• HOWE, M.L. « Misleading children's story recall: Forgetting and reminiscence of the facts », Developmental Psychology, no 27 (1991), p. 746-762.
• HUDSON, J.A., et L. SHAPIRO. « Effects of task and topic on children's narratives » dans A. McCabe et C. Peterson, éd., New directions in developing narrative structure, Hillsdale (NJ), Lawrence Erlbaum (NJ), 1991, p. 59-136.
• JONES, D.P.H., et R.D. KRUGMAN. « Can a three year old child bear witness to her sexual assault and attempted murder? », Child Abuse and Neglect, no 10 (1986), p. 253-358.
• KLAHR, D. « Information processing approaches to cognitive development », dans M.H. Bornstein et M.E. Lamb, éd., Developmental Psychology: An Advanced textbook (3e édition), Hillsdale (NJ), Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992, p. 273-335.
• KWOCK, M.S., et G.A. WINER. « Overcoming leading questions. Effects of psychosocial task variables », Journal of Educational Psychology, no 78 (1986), p. 289-293.
• LEE, K., éd. Childhood cognitive development: The essential readings in developmental psychology, Malden (MA), Blackwell Publishers, 2000.
• Loi sur la preuve au Canada, L.R.C. 1985, ch. 5, modifiée par L.C. 1987, ch. 4, art. 16.
• LYON, T.D. « The new wave of suggestibility research: A critique », Cornell Law Review, no 84 (1999), p. 1004-1087.
• LYON, T. « Speaking with children: Advice from investigative interviewers », dans F. Talley et A. Urquiza, éd., Handbook for the treatment of abused and neglected children, Needham Heights (MA), Allyn et Bacon, sous presse.
• MAAS, F. et L. ABBEDUTTO. « Young children's understanding of promising. Methodological considerations », Journal of Child Language, no 25 (1998), p. 203-214.
• MARKMAN, E. « Realizing that you don't understand: Elementary school children's awareness of inconsistencies », Child Development, no 50 (1979), p. 643-655
• MAUNSELL, C. The child witness: An investigation into children's understanding of the legal process and the perceived competence of children to act as witnesses in legal proceedings, thèse de doctorat, Trinity College, Dublin (Irlande), 2000.
• MELTON, G.B., et R.A. THOMPSON. « Getting out of a rut. Detours to less travelled paths in child witness research », dans S.J. Ceci, M.P. Toglia et D.F. Ross, éd., Children's eyewitness memory, New York, MacMillan, 1987, p. 209-230.
• MELTON, G.B. « Children's competency to testify », Law and Human Behavior, no 5 (1981), p. 73-85.
• MELTON, G.B., S.P. LIMBER, J.E. JACOBS, et L.B. OBERLANDER. Preparing sexually abused children for testimony. Children's perceptions of the legal process (rapport final), Washington (DC), NCCAN, 1992.
• MELTZOFF, A. « Intentionality and imitation: Understanding the intentions of others. Reenactment of intended acts by 18 month old children », dans K. Lee, éd., Childhood cognitive development: The essential readings, 2000, Malden (MA), Blackwell Publishers, p. 151-175.
• MERRITT, K.A., P.A. ORNSTEIN, et B. SPICKER. « Children's memory for a salient medical procedure. Implications for testimony », Pediatrics, no 94 (1994), p. 17-23.
• Ministère de la Justice du Canada. The Child Witness Court Observation Study, Ministère de la Justice du Canada, Division de la recherche et des statistiques (document interne), 2001.
• MONTOYA, J. When fragile voices intersect with a fragile process: Pretrial interrogation of child witnesses, monographie non publiée, University of San Diego, School of Law, 1993.
• MORGAN, M., et V. EDWARDS. How to interview sexual abuse victims including the use of anatomical dolls, Thousand Oaks (CA), Sage Publications, 1995.
• MOSTON. S., et T. ENGELBERG. « The effects of social support on children's eyewitness testimony », Applied Cognitive Psychology, no 6 (1992), p. 61-75.
• MULDER, M.R. et A. VRIJ. « Explaining conversational rules to children: An intervention study to facilitate children's accurate responses », Child Abuse and Neglect, no 10 (1996), p. 623-631.
• MYERS, J.E. Legal issues in child abuse and neglect, Newbury Park (CA), Sage, 1987.
• MYERS, J. « A decade of international reform to accommodate child witnesses », Criminal Justice and Behavior, no 23 (1996), p. 402-422.
• NEISSER, U. « Snapshots or benchmarks? », dans U. Neisser, éd., Memory observed, San Francisco, Freeman, 1982, p. 43-48.
• Nova Scotia Department of Justice Victims, Services Division. Child victims and the criminal justice system: Study report, 2000, extrait en octobre 2001 du site http://www.gov.ns.ca/just.
• ORBACH, Y., et M. LAMB. « Assessing the accuracy of a child's account of sexual abuse: A case study », Child Abuse and Neglect, no 23 (1999), p. 91-98.
• ORNSTEIN, P.A. « Children's long term retention of salient personal experiences », Journal of Traumatic Stress, no 8 (1995), p. 581-604.
• ORNSTEIN, P.A., B.N. GORDON, et D.M. LARUS. « Children's memory for a personally experienced event. Implications for testimony », Applied Cognitive Psychology, no 6 (1992), p. 49-60.
• ORNSTEIN, P.A., D.M. LARUS, et P.A. CLUBB. « Understanding children's testimony: Implications of research on the development of memory », dans R. Vasta, éd., Annals of child development, Londres, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, vol. 8, 1991, p.145-176.
• PACCIOCO, D.M. « The evidence of children: Testing the rules against what we know », Queens' Law Journal, no 21 (1996), p. 345- 393.
• PAGNELLO, R. La gestion transparente, diagramme apparaissant dans Le traitement des cas d'exploitation sexuelle d'enfants mettant en cause plusieurs victimes et plusieurs agresseurs : rapport final d'une consultation de deux jours (annexe V), Institut pour la prévention de l'enfance maltraitée, Toronto, 1993.
• PARK, L. et K. RENNER. « The failure to acknowledge differences in developmental capabilities leads to unjust outcomes for child witnesses in sexual abuse cases », Canadian Journal of Mental Health, no 17 (1998), p. 5-19.
• PARKER, J. « Age differences in source monitoring of performed and imagined actions on immediate and delayed tests », Journal of Experimental Psychology, no 60 (1995), p. 84- 101.
• PETERS, D.P. « The impact of naturally occurring stress on children's memory », dans S. J. Ceci, M.P. Toglia, et D.F. Ross, éd., Children's eyewitness memory, New York, Springer–Verlag, 1987, p. 122-142.
• PETERS, D.P., éd. The child witness: Cognitive and social issues, Deventer (Pays-Bas), Kluwer. 1989a.
• PETERS, D.P. « Stress and arousal on the child witness », Children's Ability to Remember Witnessed Events: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives, document présenté à la Society for Research and Child Development, C. Brainerd, président, Kansas City (MO), avril, 1989b.
• PETERS, D.P. « The influence of stress and arousal on the child witness », dans J. Doris, éd., The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony, Washington (DC), American Psychological Association, 1991, p. 60-76.
• PETERSON, C. Two years later: Children's errors when recalling trauma injuries, affiche présentée en avril 1997 à la réunion bienniale de la Society for Research in Child Development, Washington (DC).
• PETERSON, C., et M. BELL. « Children's memory for traumatic injury », Child Development, no 67 (1996), p. 3045-3070.
• PETERSON, C., et M. BIGGS. « Interviewing children about trauma: Problems with “specific” questions », Journal of Traumatic Stress, no 10 (1997), p. 279-290.
• PETERSON-BADALI, M., R. ABRAMOVITCH, et J. DUDA. « Young children's legal knowledge and reasoning ability », Revue canadienne de criminologie, no 39 (1997), p. 145-170.
• PIAGET, J. Le jugement moral chez l'enfant, Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1992.
• PIAGET, J. « Piaget's theory », dans W. Kessen, éd., et P.H. Mussen, éd. de la série, Handbook of child psychology. History, theory and methods, New York, Wiley, vol. 1, 1983, p. 103- 128.
• PIPE, M.E., M. HENAGHAN, S. BIDROSE, et J. EGERTON. « Perceptions of the legal provisions for child witnesses in New Zealand », New Zealand Law Journal, janvier 1996, p. 18-26.
• POOLE, D.A., et M.E. LAMB. Investigative interviews of children: A guide for helping professionals, Washington (DC), American Psychological Association, 1998.
• POOLE, D.A., et D.S. LINDSAY. « Interviewing preschoolers: Effects of non-suggestive techniques, parental coaching, and leading questions on reports of non-experienced events », Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, no 60 (1995), p. 129-154.
• POOLE, D.A., et D.S. LINDSAY. Misinformation from parents and children's source monitoring: Implications for testimony, document présenté en avril 1997 à la réunion bienniale de la Society for Research in Child Development, Washington (DC).
• POOLE, D.A., et D.S. LINDSAY. « Children's eyewitness reports after exposure to misinformation from parents », Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, no 7 (2001), p. 27-50.
• Projet de loi C-15, L.R.C. (3e suppl.), ch. 19, 1985.
• Projet de loi C-126, L.Cch. 45, 1993.
• QUAS, J., G. GOODMAN, S. BIDROSE, M. PIPE, S. GRAW, et D.S. ABLIN. « Emotion and memory: Children's long term remembering, forgetting, and suggestibility », Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, no 72 (1999), p. 235-270.
• QUAS, J.A., G.S. GOODMAN, S. GHETTI, et A. REDLICH. « Questioning the child witness. What can we conclude from the research this far? », Trauma, Violence and Abuse, no 1 (2000), p. 223-249.
• R. v. Ellis, 12 rapports criminels de la Nouvelle-Zélande, 172, 1994.
• ROBERTS, D. « Martensville redux », The Globe and Mail, 17 juin 1995, p. D3.
• ROBINSON, E.J., et W.P. ROBINSON. « Knowing when you don't know enough. Children's Judgments about ambiguous information », Cognition, Cathy Petersen, no 12 (1982), p. 267-280.
• ROGOFF, B. « Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development: Upper limit or growth? », Cognitive Psychology, no 11 (1990), p. 237-345.
• RUNYAN, D., M. EVERSON, G. EDELSOHN, W. HINTER, et M. COULTER. « Impact of legal intervention on sexually abused children », Journal of Pediatrics, no 113 (1988), p. 647-653.
• SAS, L., A. CUNNINGHAM, P. HURLEY, T. DICK, et A. FARNSWORTH. Tipping the balance to tell the secret: Public discovery of child sexual abuse, London Family Court Clinic, London (Ontario), 1995.
• SAS, L., P. HURLEY, A. CUNNINGHAM, et G. AUSTIN. Project Guardian: The sexual exploitation of male youth in London. A study, London Family Court Clinic, London (Ontario), 1997.
• SAS, L., P. HURLEY, A. HATCH, S. MALLA, et T. DICK. Three years after the verdict: A longitudinal study of the social and psychological adjustment of child witnesses referred to the Child Witness Project, London Family Court Clinic, London (Ontario), 1993.
• SAYWITZ, K. « Improving children's testimony. The question, the answer and the environment », dans M. Zaragoza, G. Graham, G.N. Hall, R. Hirschman et Y. Ben-Porath, éd., Memory and testimony in the child witness, Thousand Oaks (CA), Sage Publications, 1995, p. 113–140.
• SAYWITZ, K., et L. CAMPARO. « Interviewing child witnesses. A developmental perspective », Child Abuse and Neglect, no 22 (1998), p. 825-843.
• SAYWITZ, K., et D.M. ELLIOT. Interviewing children in a forensic context: A developmental approach, Washington (DC), American Psychological Association, 1999.
• SAYWITZ, K.J., et G.S. GOODMAN. « Interviewing children in and out of court: Current research and practice implications », dans J. Briere, L. Berliner, J.A. Bulkley, C. Jenny et T. Reid, éd., The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment, Thousand Oaks (CA), Sage Publications, 1996, p. 217-318.
• SAYWITZ, K., C. JAENICKE, et L. CAMPARO. « Children's knowledge of legal terminology », Law and Human Behavior, no 14 (1990), p. 523-535.
• SAYWITZ, K.J., et R. NATHANSON. « Children's testimony and their perceptions of stress in and out of the courtroom », International Journal of Child Abuse and Neglect, no 17 (1993), p. 613-622.
• SCHMITZ, C. « Whack sex complainants at the preliminary inquiry », The Lawyer's Weekly, 27 mai 1988, p. 22-23.
• SCHUMANN, J.P., N. BALA, et K. LEE. « Developmentally appropriate questions for child witnesses », Queen's Law Journal, no 25 (1999), p. 251-304.
• SELMAN, R.L., M.Z. SCHORIN, C.R. STONE, et E. PHELPS. « A naturalistic study of children's social understanding », Developmental Psychology, no 19 (1983), p. 82-102.
• SIEGLER, R.S. Enfant et raisonnement : le développement cognitif de l'enfant (1re éd.), Paris, Université De Boeck, 2001.
• SINGER, D., et T. REVENSON. A Piaget primer: How a child thinks (éd. rév.), New York, Plume/Penguin, 1996.
• South-Western Ontario Child Witness Network. I'm doing my job in court. Are you? Questions for the criminal justice system, Toronto Child Abuse Centre, Toronto, 1999
• STAFFORD, A., et S. ASQUITH. The witness in the Scottish Criminal Justice System, Edinburgh (Écosse), Scottish Office Central Research Unit, 1992.
• State v. Michaels, 642, A.2d. 1372, NJ, 1994.
• STEWARD, M., K. BUSSEY, G. GOODMAN, et K. SAYWITZ. « Implications of developmental research for interviewing children », Child Abuse and Neglect, no 17 (1993), p. 25-37.
• TERR, L. « What happens to early memories of trauma? A study of 20 children under five at the time of documented traumatic events », Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, no 27 (1988), p. 96-104.
• THOMPSON, W.C., A. CLARKE- STEWART, et S.J. LEPORE. « What did the janitor do? Suggestive interviewing, accuracy and children's accounts », Law and Human Behavior, no 21 (1997), p. 405-426.
• WADSWORTH, B.J. Piaget's theory of cognitive development, New York, Longman, 1971.
• WALKER, A.G. « Questioning young children in court: A linguistic study », Law and Human Behavior, no 17 (1993), p. 59-81.
• WALKER, A.G. Handbook on questioning children: A linguistic perspective, Washington (DC), American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law, 1994.
• WALKER, A.G. Handbook on Questioning Children: A Linguistic Perspective, Center for Children and the Law, American Bar Association (2e éd.), Washington (DC), 1999.
• WARREN-LEUBECKER, A., C. TATE, I. HINTON, et N. OZBEK. « What do children know about the legal system and when do they know it? », dans S.J. Ozbek, D.F. Ross et M. Toglia, éd., Perspectives on children's testimony, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1989, p. 131-157.
• WHITCOMB, D. When the victim is a child (2e édition), Washington (DC), National Institute of Justice, 1992.
• WHITCOMB, D., G.S. GOODMAN, D. RUNYAN, et S. HOAK. The emotional effects of testifying on sexually abused children, National Institute of Justice: Research in Brief, US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, avril 1994.
• WHITCOMB, D., D.K. RUNYAN, E. DEVOS, et W.M. HUNTER. Final Report: Child victim and witness research and development program, US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington (DC), 1991.
• WHITCOMB, D., E.R. SHAPIRO, et L.D. STELLWAGEN. When the victim is a child. Issues for judges and prosecutors, National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington (DC), 1985.
• WILSON, J. « Children's evidence in legal proceedings: A perspective on the Canadian position », Law Society of Upper Canada Gazette, no 23 (1989), p. 281.
• WOLFE, V.V., L. SAS, et S.K. WILSON. « Some issues in preparing sexually abused children for courtroom testimony », Behavior Therapist, no 10 (1987), p. 107-113.
• WOOLARD, J., N. REPUCCI, et R. REDDING. « Theoretical and methodological issues in studying children's capacities in legal contexts », Law and Human Behavior, no 20 (1996), p. 219-228.

• Page précédente
• Table des matières
• Page suivante